All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Burak Gorkemli <burakgmail-dccp@yahoo.com>
To: dccp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Announce]: Test results with latest CCID3 patch set
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:45:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15735.52980.qm@web30010.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071210154008.GA16839@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk>

>
> Here is my list of points, hoping that the others will add theirs, too:
> 
>  * would be good to have a standardised set of scripts,
> for
> 
 comparison/benchmarking
> 
>  * the built-in VoIP module only works for UDP -- is it possible
> to
> 
 port this to DCCP?
>  
>  * as per previous email, more complex traffic scenarios would be
> good,
> 
 in particular
>    - switching on/off background traffic at times to
> observe
> 
 TCP/flow-friendliness
>    - running multiple DCCP flows in parallel and at overlapping times 
>

The scenario that I mostly use is limiting the bandwidth with a middlebox running TBF. However, all of the recent trees except 2.6.20final_dccp (2.6.20 patched with Ian's modifications) that I have tested fail to achieve acceptable transfer rates. Test setup is as follows, unless otherwise mentioned:

- Two Linux boxes are connected through another Linux box (middlebox) running netem. The boxes at the edge are identical machines with P4 2.4GHz and 512MB memory. Middlebox is a P4 2.6GHz with 512MB memory.
- TBF is used to limit the bandwidth. TBF buffer is set as 10000 bytes and the limit is 30000 bytes.
- 20ms constant delay is present in both sender->receiver and receiver->sender directions.
- iperf in bytestream mode is used in these tests, and the streaming duration is set as 60 seconds.
- DCCPv4 is used in the tests.


Below are the results of the two different trees:

Kernel: 2.6.20final_dccp (2.6.20 davem tree with Ian's patches - except for the best_packet_next patch. The patches applied are not the latest ones which are updated at 2nd of December, but the ones before the latest.)
Results:
Bottleneck\x1000Kbps, tx_qlen=5:    0.0-60.3 sec    6.86 MBytes   955 Kbits/sec



Bottleneck 00Kbps, tx_qlen=5:    0.0-60.1 sec    13.3 MBytes   1.86 Kbits/sec




BottleneckP00Kbps, tx_qlen=5:    0.0-60.0 sec    27.2 MBytes   3.80 Kbits/sec




Bottleneck\x10000Kbps, limitP000bytes, tx_qlen=5:    0.0-60.0 sec    43.6 MBytes   6.09 Kbits/sec






Kernel: 2.6.24-rc4 (Gerrit's latest tree):
Results (Bottleneck bandwidth, tx_qlen:    iperf server output):
Bottleneck\x1000Kbps, tx_qlen=5:    0.0-168.2 sec    107 KBytes   5.21 Kbits/sec


Bottleneck\x1000Kbps, tx_qlen=0:    0.0-147.8 sec    157 KBytes   8.71 Kbits/sec


Bottleneck 00Kbps, tx_qlen=5:    0.0-89.0 sec    138 KBytes   12.7 Kbits/sec


Bottleneck 00Kbps, tx_qlen=0:    0.0-103.9 sec    203 KBytes   16.0 Kbits/sec


BottleneckP00Kbps, tx_qlen=5:    0.0-66.6 sec    222 KBytes   27.3 Kbits/sec


BottleneckP00Kbps, tx_qlen=0:    0.0-100.2 sec    314 KBytes   25.7 Kbits/sec


Bottleneck\x10000Kbps, tx_qlen=5:    0.0-60.5 sec    1.30 MBytes   181 Kbits/sec


Bottleneck\x10000Kbps, tx_qlen=0:    0.0-65.3 sec    922 KBytes   116 Kbits/sec

While writing this mail, I noticed that Ian has updated his patch set for 2.6.20. I will use this set and repeat the tests this week, hopefully. Moreover, I also tested Ian's patches for other trees (2.6.22 and 2.6.24) but the results were not as good as 2.6.20final_dccp results, if I remember correctly. I can go over them again, if necessary.


> 
> Gerrit   
> -

Burak




  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-12-12 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-10 15:40 [Announce]: Test results with latest CCID3 patch set Gerrit Renker
2007-12-11 13:59 ` Alessio Botta
2007-12-11 14:21 ` Gerrit Renker
2007-12-11 17:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-12-12 14:45 ` Burak Gorkemli [this message]
2007-12-12 16:42 ` Gerrit Renker
2007-12-12 20:40 ` Burak Gorkemli
2007-12-12 23:19 ` Alessio Botta
2007-12-12 23:21 ` Alessio Botta
2007-12-13  0:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-12-13  9:37 ` Gerrit Renker
2007-12-13 13:28 ` Burak Gorkemli
2007-12-13 14:14 ` Gerrit Renker
2007-12-13 16:35 ` Ian McDonald

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15735.52980.qm@web30010.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
    --to=burakgmail-dccp@yahoo.com \
    --cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.