From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Re: Feature bug with the new mount API: no way of doing read only bind mounts
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:15:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1574352920.3277.18.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17268.1574323839@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On Thu, 2019-11-21 at 08:10 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
>
> > I was looking to use the read only bind mount as a template for
> > reimplementing shiftfs when I discovered that you can't actually
> > create a read only bind mount with the new API. The problem is
> > that fspick() will only reconfigure the underlying superblock,
> > which you don't want because you only want the bound subtree to
> > become read only and open_tree()/move_mount() doesn't give you any
> > facility to add or change options on the bind.
>
> You'd use open_tree() with OPEN_TREE_CLONE and possibly AT_RECURSIVE
> rather than fspick(). fspick() is, as you observed, more for
> reconfiguring the superblock.
In the abstract, I think the concept of a configuration file descriptor
with the, open add parameters and execution to fd, and optionally
convert to representation or reconfigure in place is a very generic
one. If we did agree to do that for bind mounts as well, I wouldn't
overload the existing logic, I'd lift it up to the generic level,
probably by hooking the execution parts, and make superblock and bind
two implementations of it. It would basically be 3 system calls:
configopen, configparam and configconvert although obviously with more
appealing names.
The reason for thinking like this is I can see it having utility in
some of the more complex SCSI configuration operations we do today via
a bunch of mechanisms including configfs that could more compactly be
done by this file descriptor mechanism.
I'd also note that this plethora of system calls you have could then go
away: fspick itself would just become an open type to which the path
file descriptor would then be a required parameter, as would open_tree
and the missing mount_setattr would then just work.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-21 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-21 0:11 Feature bug with the new mount API: no way of doing read only bind mounts James Bottomley
2019-11-21 8:10 ` David Howells
2019-11-21 14:54 ` Christian Brauner
2019-11-21 15:04 ` David Howells
2019-11-21 15:00 ` James Bottomley
2019-11-21 16:15 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2019-11-27 20:32 ` James Bottomley
2019-11-27 20:33 ` [RFC 1/6] logger: add a limited buffer logging facility James Bottomley
2019-11-27 20:34 ` [RFC 2/6] configfd: add generic file descriptor based configuration parser James Bottomley
2019-11-27 20:35 ` [RFC 3/6] configfd: syscall: wire up configfd syscalls James Bottomley
2019-11-27 20:36 ` [RFC 4/6] fs: implement fsconfig via configfd James Bottomley
2019-11-27 20:37 ` [RFC 5/6] fs: expose internal interfaces open_detached_copy and do_reconfigure_mount James Bottomley
2019-11-27 20:38 ` [RFC 6/6] fs: bind: add configfs type for bind mounts James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1574352920.3277.18.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.