From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] pinctrl: samsung: Usability and extensibiltiy improvements Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:22:17 +0200 Message-ID: <1574970.TNZCJfSix7@amdc1227> References: <1349685556-23718-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from mailout2.samsung.com ([203.254.224.25]:63454 "EHLO mailout2.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932335Ab2JJPWf (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:22:35 -0400 Received: from epcpsbgm2.samsung.com (epcpsbgm2 [203.254.230.27]) by mailout2.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MBO00KZMO1MQ870@mailout2.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:22:34 +0900 (KST) Received: from amdc1227.localnet ([106.116.147.199]) by mmp1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTPA id <0MBO0055KO180M20@mmp1.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 00:22:34 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Thomas Abraham , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, tomasz.figa@gmail.com On Wednesday 10 of October 2012 09:46:28 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > This patch series is a work on improving usability and extensibiltiy of > > the> > > pinctrl-samsung driver. It consists of three main parts: > > - moving SoC-specific data to device tree > > - converting the driver to use one GPIO chip and one IRQ domain per > > pin bank - introducing generic wake-up interrupt capability > > description > > So can you prepare a patch series which does all but the first > bullet to begin with, and a SoC-and register offset patch > on top of that as a separate series, because it is controversial? > > I don't like that these two things are mingled together like this > in an all-or-nothing manner. > > So I'm OK with a patch series for bulle (2) and (3) but not (1). > > And I'd like to have Thomas A:s ACK on the series too. > I have managed to rework the changes to drop (1). I will send next version of patches tomorrow. It would be nice to have them merged for 3.7, as they are rather important for further work. Moving data from the driver to device tree is not as important, so it might be discussed later. Best regards, -- Tomasz Figa Samsung Poland R&D Center From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:22:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 00/16] pinctrl: samsung: Usability and extensibiltiy improvements In-Reply-To: References: <1349685556-23718-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> Message-ID: <1574970.TNZCJfSix7@amdc1227> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 10 of October 2012 09:46:28 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > This patch series is a work on improving usability and extensibiltiy of > > the> > > pinctrl-samsung driver. It consists of three main parts: > > - moving SoC-specific data to device tree > > - converting the driver to use one GPIO chip and one IRQ domain per > > pin bank - introducing generic wake-up interrupt capability > > description > > So can you prepare a patch series which does all but the first > bullet to begin with, and a SoC-and register offset patch > on top of that as a separate series, because it is controversial? > > I don't like that these two things are mingled together like this > in an all-or-nothing manner. > > So I'm OK with a patch series for bulle (2) and (3) but not (1). > > And I'd like to have Thomas A:s ACK on the series too. > I have managed to rework the changes to drop (1). I will send next version of patches tomorrow. It would be nice to have them merged for 3.7, as they are rather important for further work. Moving data from the driver to device tree is not as important, so it might be discussed later. Best regards, -- Tomasz Figa Samsung Poland R&D Center