From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: arnd@arndb.de, jkosina@suse.cz, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] cpu/SMT: Fix x86 link error without CONFIG_SYSFS" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 15:40:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <157944481075214@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From dc8d37ed304eeeea47e65fb9edc1c6c8b0093386 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 20:56:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] cpu/SMT: Fix x86 link error without CONFIG_SYSFS
When CONFIG_SYSFS is disabled, but CONFIG_HOTPLUG_SMT is enabled,
the kernel fails to link:
arch/x86/power/cpu.o: In function `hibernate_resume_nonboot_cpu_disable':
(.text+0x38d): undefined reference to `cpuhp_smt_enable'
arch/x86/power/hibernate.o: In function `arch_resume_nosmt':
hibernate.c:(.text+0x291): undefined reference to `cpuhp_smt_enable'
hibernate.c:(.text+0x29c): undefined reference to `cpuhp_smt_disable'
Move the exported functions out of the #ifdef section into its
own with the correct conditions.
The patch that caused this is marked for stable backports, so
this one may need to be backported as well.
Fixes: ec527c318036 ("x86/power: Fix 'nosmt' vs hibernation triple fault during resume")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191210195614.786555-1-arnd@arndb.de
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index a59cc980adad..4dc279ed3b2d 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -1909,6 +1909,78 @@ void __cpuhp_remove_state(enum cpuhp_state state, bool invoke)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpuhp_remove_state);
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_SMT
+static void cpuhp_offline_cpu_device(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
+
+ dev->offline = true;
+ /* Tell user space about the state change */
+ kobject_uevent(&dev->kobj, KOBJ_OFFLINE);
+}
+
+static void cpuhp_online_cpu_device(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
+
+ dev->offline = false;
+ /* Tell user space about the state change */
+ kobject_uevent(&dev->kobj, KOBJ_ONLINE);
+}
+
+int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
+{
+ int cpu, ret = 0;
+
+ cpu_maps_update_begin();
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ if (topology_is_primary_thread(cpu))
+ continue;
+ ret = cpu_down_maps_locked(cpu, CPUHP_OFFLINE);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ /*
+ * As this needs to hold the cpu maps lock it's impossible
+ * to call device_offline() because that ends up calling
+ * cpu_down() which takes cpu maps lock. cpu maps lock
+ * needs to be held as this might race against in kernel
+ * abusers of the hotplug machinery (thermal management).
+ *
+ * So nothing would update device:offline state. That would
+ * leave the sysfs entry stale and prevent onlining after
+ * smt control has been changed to 'off' again. This is
+ * called under the sysfs hotplug lock, so it is properly
+ * serialized against the regular offline usage.
+ */
+ cpuhp_offline_cpu_device(cpu);
+ }
+ if (!ret)
+ cpu_smt_control = ctrlval;
+ cpu_maps_update_done();
+ return ret;
+}
+
+int cpuhp_smt_enable(void)
+{
+ int cpu, ret = 0;
+
+ cpu_maps_update_begin();
+ cpu_smt_control = CPU_SMT_ENABLED;
+ for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
+ /* Skip online CPUs and CPUs on offline nodes */
+ if (cpu_online(cpu) || !node_online(cpu_to_node(cpu)))
+ continue;
+ ret = _cpu_up(cpu, 0, CPUHP_ONLINE);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ /* See comment in cpuhp_smt_disable() */
+ cpuhp_online_cpu_device(cpu);
+ }
+ cpu_maps_update_done();
+ return ret;
+}
+#endif
+
#if defined(CONFIG_SYSFS) && defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)
static ssize_t show_cpuhp_state(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
@@ -2063,77 +2135,6 @@ static const struct attribute_group cpuhp_cpu_root_attr_group = {
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_SMT
-static void cpuhp_offline_cpu_device(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
-
- dev->offline = true;
- /* Tell user space about the state change */
- kobject_uevent(&dev->kobj, KOBJ_OFFLINE);
-}
-
-static void cpuhp_online_cpu_device(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
-
- dev->offline = false;
- /* Tell user space about the state change */
- kobject_uevent(&dev->kobj, KOBJ_ONLINE);
-}
-
-int cpuhp_smt_disable(enum cpuhp_smt_control ctrlval)
-{
- int cpu, ret = 0;
-
- cpu_maps_update_begin();
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
- if (topology_is_primary_thread(cpu))
- continue;
- ret = cpu_down_maps_locked(cpu, CPUHP_OFFLINE);
- if (ret)
- break;
- /*
- * As this needs to hold the cpu maps lock it's impossible
- * to call device_offline() because that ends up calling
- * cpu_down() which takes cpu maps lock. cpu maps lock
- * needs to be held as this might race against in kernel
- * abusers of the hotplug machinery (thermal management).
- *
- * So nothing would update device:offline state. That would
- * leave the sysfs entry stale and prevent onlining after
- * smt control has been changed to 'off' again. This is
- * called under the sysfs hotplug lock, so it is properly
- * serialized against the regular offline usage.
- */
- cpuhp_offline_cpu_device(cpu);
- }
- if (!ret)
- cpu_smt_control = ctrlval;
- cpu_maps_update_done();
- return ret;
-}
-
-int cpuhp_smt_enable(void)
-{
- int cpu, ret = 0;
-
- cpu_maps_update_begin();
- cpu_smt_control = CPU_SMT_ENABLED;
- for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
- /* Skip online CPUs and CPUs on offline nodes */
- if (cpu_online(cpu) || !node_online(cpu_to_node(cpu)))
- continue;
- ret = _cpu_up(cpu, 0, CPUHP_ONLINE);
- if (ret)
- break;
- /* See comment in cpuhp_smt_disable() */
- cpuhp_online_cpu_device(cpu);
- }
- cpu_maps_update_done();
- return ret;
-}
-
-
static ssize_t
__store_smt_control(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
const char *buf, size_t count)
reply other threads:[~2020-01-19 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=157944481075214@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.