From: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 20/25] kmemleak: Cosmetic changes
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:18:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1582557503.12738.22.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200224091204.xzn6cheydarek6ex@linutronix.de>
On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 10:12 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-02-21 15:24:48 [-0600], zanussi@kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> >
> > v4.14.170-rt75-rc1 stable review patch.
> > If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> This makes no sense to apply it. I updated my patch in the RT queue
> to
> what has been sent (and later merged) upstream. Then I was forced to
> sync the non-rebase branch with the rebase branch. This is the
> result.
>
> What should be applied instead is
> fb2c57edcb943 ("kmemleak: Change the lock of kmemleak_object to
> raw_spinlock_t")
>
I did apply that patch (as patch 14/25 of this series). This patch
seemed like it was adding some comment bits mised for that one, which
is all it does.
Thanks,
Tom
> from the v4.19-RT branch.
>
> Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-24 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-21 21:24 [PATCH RT 00/25] Linux v4.14.170-rt75-rc1 zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 01/25] Fix wrong-variable use in irq_set_affinity_notifier zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 02/25] x86: preempt: Check preemption level before looking at lazy-preempt zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 03/25] sched/deadline: Ensure inactive_timer runs in hardirq context zanussi
2020-02-24 8:33 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-02-25 14:50 ` Juri Lelli
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 04/25] i2c: hix5hd2: Remove IRQF_ONESHOT zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 05/25] i2c: exynos5: " zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 06/25] sched: migrate_dis/enable: Use sleeping_lock…() to annotate sleeping points zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 07/25] sched: __set_cpus_allowed_ptr: Check cpus_mask, not cpus_ptr zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 08/25] sched: Remove dead __migrate_disabled() check zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 09/25] sched: migrate disable: Protect cpus_ptr with lock zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 10/25] lib/smp_processor_id: Don't use cpumask_equal() zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 11/25] futex: Make the futex_hash_bucket spinlock_t again and bring back its old state zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 12/25] locking/rtmutex: Clean ->pi_blocked_on in the error case zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 13/25] lib/ubsan: Don't seralize UBSAN report zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 14/25] kmemleak: Change the lock of kmemleak_object to raw_spinlock_t zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 15/25] sched: migrate_enable: Use select_fallback_rq() zanussi
2020-02-24 9:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-02-24 15:31 ` Tom Zanussi
2020-02-24 16:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-02-24 22:15 ` Scott Wood
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 16/25] Revert "ARM: Initialize split page table locks for vector page" zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 17/25] x86/fpu: Don't cache access to fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx zanussi
2020-02-24 8:55 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-02-24 15:12 ` Tom Zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 18/25] locking: Make spinlock_t and rwlock_t a RCU section on RT zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 19/25] userfaultfd: Use a seqlock instead of seqcount zanussi
2020-02-24 9:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-02-24 15:14 ` Tom Zanussi
2020-02-24 16:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 20/25] kmemleak: Cosmetic changes zanussi
2020-02-24 9:12 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-02-24 15:18 ` Tom Zanussi [this message]
2020-02-24 15:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 21/25] smp: Use smp_cond_func_t as type for the conditional function zanussi
2020-02-24 9:52 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-02-24 15:34 ` Tom Zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 22/25] mm/memcontrol: Move misplaced local_unlock_irqrestore() zanussi
2020-02-24 9:55 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 23/25] locallock: Include header for the `current' macro zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 24/25] sched: Provide migrate_disable/enable() inlines zanussi
2020-02-21 21:24 ` [PATCH RT 25/25] Linux 4.14.170-rt75-rc1 zanussi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1582557503.12738.22.camel@kernel.org \
--to=zanussi@kernel.org \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wagi@monom.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.