From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: fdmanana@suse.com, dsterba@suse.com, josef@toxicpanda.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] Btrfs: fix deadlock during fast fsync when logging prealloc" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 10:20:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1582795244107106@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From a5ae50dea9111db63d30d700766dd5509602f7ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 13:29:49 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix deadlock during fast fsync when logging prealloc
extents beyond eof
While logging the prealloc extents of an inode during a fast fsync we call
btrfs_truncate_inode_items(), through btrfs_log_prealloc_extents(), while
holding a read lock on a leaf of the inode's root (not the log root, the
fs/subvol root), and then that function locks the file range in the inode's
iotree. This can lead to a deadlock when:
* the fsync is ranged
* the file has prealloc extents beyond eof
* writeback for a range different from the fsync range starts
during the fsync
* the size of the file is not sector size aligned
Because when finishing an ordered extent we lock first a file range and
then try to COW the fs/subvol tree to insert an extent item.
The following diagram shows how the deadlock can happen.
CPU 1 CPU 2
btrfs_sync_file()
--> for range [0, 1MiB)
--> inode has a size of
1MiB and has 1 prealloc
extent beyond the
i_size, starting at offset
4MiB
flushes all delalloc for the
range [0MiB, 1MiB) and waits
for the respective ordered
extents to complete
--> before task at CPU 1 locks the
inode, a write into file range
[1MiB, 2MiB + 1KiB) is made
--> i_size is updated to 2MiB + 1KiB
--> writeback is started for that
range, [1MiB, 2MiB + 4KiB)
--> end offset rounded up to
be sector size aligned
btrfs_log_dentry_safe()
btrfs_log_inode_parent()
btrfs_log_inode()
btrfs_log_changed_extents()
btrfs_log_prealloc_extents()
--> does a search on the
inode's root
--> holds a read lock on
leaf X
btrfs_finish_ordered_io()
--> locks range [1MiB, 2MiB + 4KiB)
--> end offset rounded up
to be sector size aligned
--> tries to cow leaf X, through
insert_reserved_file_extent()
--> already locked by the
task at CPU 1
btrfs_truncate_inode_items()
--> gets an i_size of
2MiB + 1KiB, which is
not sector size
aligned
--> tries to lock file
range [2MiB, (u64)-1)
--> the start range
is rounded down
from 2MiB + 1K
to 2MiB to be sector
size aligned
--> but the subrange
[2MiB, 2MiB + 4KiB) is
already locked by
task at CPU 2 which
is waiting to get a
write lock on leaf X
for which we are
holding a read lock
*** deadlock ***
This results in a stack trace like the following, triggered by test case
generic/561 from fstests:
[ 2779.973608] INFO: task kworker/u8:6:247 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[ 2779.979536] Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-btrfs-next-53 #1
[ 2779.984503] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[ 2779.990136] kworker/u8:6 D 0 247 2 0x80004000
[ 2779.990457] Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
[ 2779.990466] Call Trace:
[ 2779.990491] ? __schedule+0x384/0xa30
[ 2779.990521] schedule+0x33/0xe0
[ 2779.990616] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x19e/0x2e0 [btrfs]
[ 2779.990632] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
[ 2779.990730] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x2f/0x40 [btrfs]
[ 2779.990782] btrfs_search_slot+0x510/0x1000 [btrfs]
[ 2779.990869] btrfs_lookup_file_extent+0x4a/0x70 [btrfs]
[ 2779.990944] __btrfs_drop_extents+0x161/0x1060 [btrfs]
[ 2779.990987] ? mark_held_locks+0x6d/0xc0
[ 2779.990994] ? __slab_alloc.isra.49+0x99/0x100
[ 2779.991060] ? insert_reserved_file_extent.constprop.19+0x64/0x300 [btrfs]
[ 2779.991145] insert_reserved_file_extent.constprop.19+0x97/0x300 [btrfs]
[ 2779.991222] ? start_transaction+0xdd/0x5c0 [btrfs]
[ 2779.991291] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x4f4/0x840 [btrfs]
[ 2779.991405] btrfs_work_helper+0xaa/0x720 [btrfs]
[ 2779.991432] process_one_work+0x26d/0x6a0
[ 2779.991460] worker_thread+0x4f/0x3e0
[ 2779.991481] ? process_one_work+0x6a0/0x6a0
[ 2779.991489] kthread+0x103/0x140
[ 2779.991499] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
[ 2779.991515] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
(...)
[ 2780.026211] INFO: task fsstress:17375 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[ 2780.027480] Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-btrfs-next-53 #1
[ 2780.028482] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[ 2780.030035] fsstress D 0 17375 17373 0x00004000
[ 2780.030038] Call Trace:
[ 2780.030044] ? __schedule+0x384/0xa30
[ 2780.030052] schedule+0x33/0xe0
[ 2780.030075] lock_extent_bits+0x20c/0x320 [btrfs]
[ 2780.030094] ? btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0xf4/0x1150 [btrfs]
[ 2780.030098] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x59/0xa0
[ 2780.030102] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
[ 2780.030122] btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0x133/0x1150 [btrfs]
[ 2780.030151] ? btrfs_set_path_blocking+0xb2/0x160 [btrfs]
[ 2780.030165] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x379/0x1000 [btrfs]
[ 2780.030195] btrfs_log_changed_extents.isra.8+0x841/0x93e [btrfs]
[ 2780.030202] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0
[ 2780.030215] ? btrfs_get_num_csums+0x10/0x10 [btrfs]
[ 2780.030239] btrfs_log_inode+0xf83/0x1124 [btrfs]
[ 2780.030251] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x45/0x2a0
[ 2780.030275] btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x2a0/0xe40 [btrfs]
[ 2780.030282] ? dget_parent+0xa1/0x370
[ 2780.030309] btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x4a/0x70 [btrfs]
[ 2780.030329] btrfs_sync_file+0x3f3/0x490 [btrfs]
[ 2780.030339] do_fsync+0x38/0x60
[ 2780.030343] __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x13/0x20
[ 2780.030345] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x280
[ 2780.030348] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 2780.030356] RIP: 0033:0x7f2d80f6d5f0
[ 2780.030361] Code: Bad RIP value.
[ 2780.030362] RSP: 002b:00007ffdba3c8548 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004b
[ 2780.030364] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f2d80f6d5f0
[ 2780.030365] RDX: 00007ffdba3c84b0 RSI: 00007ffdba3c84b0 RDI: 0000000000000003
[ 2780.030367] RBP: 000000000000004a R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007ffdba3c855c
[ 2780.030368] R10: 0000000000000078 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000001f4
[ 2780.030369] R13: 0000000051eb851f R14: 00007ffdba3c85f0 R15: 0000557a49220d90
So fix this by making btrfs_truncate_inode_items() not lock the range in
the inode's iotree when the target root is a log root, since it's not
needed to lock the range for log roots as the protection from the inode's
lock and log_mutex are all that's needed.
Fixes: 28553fa992cb28 ("Btrfs: fix race between shrinking truncate and fiemap")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 4f47ba652b31..1ccb3f8d528d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -4103,8 +4103,9 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
return -ENOMEM;
path->reada = READA_BACK;
- lock_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1,
- &cached_state);
+ if (root->root_key.objectid != BTRFS_TREE_LOG_OBJECTID)
+ lock_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1,
+ &cached_state);
/*
* We want to drop from the next block forward in case this new size is
@@ -4368,11 +4369,10 @@ int btrfs_truncate_inode_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
if (!ret && last_size > new_size)
last_size = new_size;
btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, last_size, NULL);
+ unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start,
+ (u64)-1, &cached_state);
}
- unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, (u64)-1,
- &cached_state);
-
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
reply other threads:[~2020-02-27 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1582795244107106@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.