From: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@suse.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@citrix.com>,
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: [Xen-devel] xl vcpu-pin peculiarities in core scheduling mode
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 13:34:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1585056853121.58010@citrix.com> (raw)
Hi Juergen,
I've notived there is no documentation about how vcpu-pin is supposed to work
with core scheduling enabled. I did some experiments and noticed the following
inconsistencies:
1. xl vcpu-pin 5 0 0
Windows 10 (64-bit) (1) 5 0 0 -b- 1644.0 0 / all
Windows 10 (64-bit) (1) 5 1 1 -b- 1650.1 0 / all
^ ^
CPU 1 doesn't match reported hard-affinity of 0. Should this command set
hard-affinity of vCPU 1 to 1? Or should it be 0-1 for both vCPUs instead?
2. xl vcpu-pin 5 0 1
libxl: error: libxl_sched.c:62:libxl__set_vcpuaffinity: Domain 5:Setting vcpu affinity: Invalid argument
This is expected but perhaps needs documenting somewhere?
3. xl vcpu-pin 5 0 1-2
Windows 10 (64-bit) (1) 5 0 2 -b- 1646.7 1-2 / all
Windows 10 (64-bit) (1) 5 1 3 -b- 1651.6 1-2 / all
^ ^^^
Here is a CPU / affinity mismatch again, but the more interesting fact
is that setting 1-2 is allowed at all, I'd expect CPU would never be set
to 1 with such settings.
Please let me know what you think about the above cases.
--
Thanks,
Sergey
next reply other threads:[~2020-03-24 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-24 13:34 Sergey Dyasli [this message]
2020-03-24 14:22 ` [Xen-devel] xl vcpu-pin peculiarities in core scheduling mode Jürgen Groß
2020-03-24 14:55 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1585056853121.58010@citrix.com \
--to=sergey.dyasli@citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@citrix.com \
--cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.