From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: yarl-baudig@mailoo.org, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
Stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: patch "iio: st_sensors: rely on odr mask to know if odr can be set" added to staging-linus
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:08:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1587384529145193@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
iio: st_sensors: rely on odr mask to know if odr can be set
to my staging git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git
in the staging-linus branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
From e450e07c14abae563ad13b064cbce9fdccc6bc8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lary Gibaud <yarl-baudig@mailoo.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 17:16:06 +0200
Subject: iio: st_sensors: rely on odr mask to know if odr can be set
Indeed, relying on addr being not 0 cannot work because some device have
their register to set odr at address 0. As a matter of fact, if the odr
can be set, then there is a mask.
Sensors with ODR register at address 0 are: lsm303dlh, lsm303dlhc, lsm303dlm
Fixes: 7d245172675a ("iio: common: st_sensors: check odr address value in st_sensors_set_odr()")
Signed-off-by: Lary Gibaud <yarl-baudig@mailoo.org>
Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
index 0e35ff06f9af..13bdfbbf5f71 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ int st_sensors_set_odr(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned int odr)
struct st_sensor_odr_avl odr_out = {0, 0};
struct st_sensor_data *sdata = iio_priv(indio_dev);
- if (!sdata->sensor_settings->odr.addr)
+ if (!sdata->sensor_settings->odr.mask)
return 0;
err = st_sensors_match_odr(sdata->sensor_settings, odr, &odr_out);
--
2.26.1
reply other threads:[~2020-04-20 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1587384529145193@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yarl-baudig@mailoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.