From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: properly parse 32-bit domain numbers
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 11:16:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1589307388.25513.0@networkplumber.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200512133057.106374-1-dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 3:30 pm, Darek Stojaczyk
<dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com> wrote:
> The parsing code was bailing on domains greater than UINT16_MAX,
> but domain numbers like that are still valid and present on some
> systems.
> One example is Intel VMD (Volume Management Device), which acts
> somewhat
> as a software-managed PCI switch and its upstream linux driver assigns
> all downstream devices a PCI domain of 0x10000.
>
> Parsing a BDF like 10000:01:00.0 was failing before. To fix it,
> increase
> the upper limit of domain number to UINT32_MAX. This matches the size
> of
> struct rte_pci_addr->domain (uint32).
>
> Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com
> <mailto:dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>>
> ---
> lib/librte_pci/rte_pci.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_pci/rte_pci.c b/lib/librte_pci/rte_pci.c
> index d1ab6b414d..ad2cdfebb2 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_pci/rte_pci.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_pci/rte_pci.c
> @@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ pci_dbdf_parse(const char *input, struct
> rte_pci_addr *dev_addr)
>
> errno = 0;
> val = strtoul(in, &end, 16);
> - if (errno != 0 || end[0] != ':' || val > UINT16_MAX)
> + if (errno != 0 || end[0] != ':' || val > UINT32_MAX)
> return -EINVAL;
> - dev_addr->domain = (uint16_t)val;
> + dev_addr->domain = (uint32_t)val;
> in = end + 1;
> in = get_u8_pciaddr_field(in, &dev_addr->bus, ':');
> if (in == NULL)
> --
> 2.17.1
Agree this came up before on Hyper-V as well. It meant fixing libpci.
Not sure the cast of val is necessary, other than an attempt to silence
some static checker
about implicit type conversion causing loss of precision.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-12 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-12 13:30 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: properly parse 32-bit domain numbers Darek Stojaczyk
2020-05-12 15:08 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-05-12 18:16 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2020-05-13 9:04 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2020-05-13 12:20 ` Stojaczyk, Dariusz
2020-05-19 9:15 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1589307388.25513.0@networkplumber.org \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.