From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: saravanak@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: patch "driver core: Fix handling of SYNC_STATE_ONLY + STATELESS device links" added to driver-core-linus
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 10:55:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <159005130120762@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
driver core: Fix handling of SYNC_STATE_ONLY + STATELESS device links
to my driver-core git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git
in the driver-core-linus branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
From 44e960490ddf868fc9135151c4a658936e771dc2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 21:36:26 -0700
Subject: driver core: Fix handling of SYNC_STATE_ONLY + STATELESS device links
Commit 21c27f06587d ("driver core: Fix SYNC_STATE_ONLY device link
implementation") didn't completely fix STATELESS + SYNC_STATE_ONLY
handling.
What looks like an optimization in that commit is actually a bug that
causes an if condition to always take the else path. This prevents
reordering of devices in the dpm_list when a DL_FLAG_STATELESS device
link is create on top of an existing DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY device
link.
Fixes: 21c27f06587d ("driver core: Fix SYNC_STATE_ONLY device link implementation")
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200520043626.181820-1-saravanak@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/base/core.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index 4e0e430315d9..0cad34f1eede 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -360,12 +360,14 @@ struct device_link *device_link_add(struct device *consumer,
if (flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS) {
kref_get(&link->kref);
- link->flags |= DL_FLAG_STATELESS;
if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY &&
- !(link->flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS))
+ !(link->flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS)) {
+ link->flags |= DL_FLAG_STATELESS;
goto reorder;
- else
+ } else {
+ link->flags |= DL_FLAG_STATELESS;
goto out;
+ }
}
/*
--
2.26.2
reply other threads:[~2020-05-21 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=159005130120762@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.