All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>,
	Alex Guzman <alex@guzman.io>
Subject: [PATCH v2] tpm: fix TIS locality timeout problems
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 11:10:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1590689457.3449.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)

It has been reported that some TIS based TPMs are giving unexpected
errors when using the O_NONBLOCK path of the TPM device. The problem
is that some TPMs don't like it when you get and then relinquish a
locality (as the tpm_try_get_ops()/tpm_put_ops() pair does) without
sending a command.  This currently happens all the time in the
O_NONBLOCK write path. Fix this by moving the tpm_try_get_ops()
further down the code to after the O_NONBLOCK determination is made.
This is safe because the priv->buffer_mutex still protects the priv
state being modified.

BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206275
Fixes: d23d12484307 ("tpm: fix invalid locking in NONBLOCKING mode")
Reported-by: Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com>
Tested-by: Alex Guzman <alex@guzman.io>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c | 19 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
index 87f449340202..1784530b8387 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-dev-common.c
@@ -189,15 +189,6 @@ ssize_t tpm_common_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	/* atomic tpm command send and result receive. We only hold the ops
-	 * lock during this period so that the tpm can be unregistered even if
-	 * the char dev is held open.
-	 */
-	if (tpm_try_get_ops(priv->chip)) {
-		ret = -EPIPE;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
 	priv->response_length = 0;
 	priv->response_read = false;
 	*off = 0;
@@ -211,11 +202,19 @@ ssize_t tpm_common_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 	if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
 		priv->command_enqueued = true;
 		queue_work(tpm_dev_wq, &priv->async_work);
-		tpm_put_ops(priv->chip);
 		mutex_unlock(&priv->buffer_mutex);
 		return size;
 	}
 
+	/* atomic tpm command send and result receive. We only hold the ops
+	 * lock during this period so that the tpm can be unregistered even if
+	 * the char dev is held open.
+	 */
+	if (tpm_try_get_ops(priv->chip)) {
+		ret = -EPIPE;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	ret = tpm_dev_transmit(priv->chip, priv->space, priv->data_buffer,
 			       sizeof(priv->data_buffer));
 	tpm_put_ops(priv->chip);
-- 
2.26.2


             reply	other threads:[~2020-05-28 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-28 18:10 James Bottomley [this message]
2020-05-28 19:10 ` [PATCH v2] tpm: fix TIS locality timeout problems Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1590689457.3449.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=alex@guzman.io \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@dell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.