From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB160C433DF for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 21:41:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB73206E6 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 21:41:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=hansenpartnership.com header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.b="Y0H7ex29"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=hansenpartnership.com header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.b="Y0H7ex29" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728715AbgFEVlx (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:41:53 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:55416 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728727AbgFEVlv (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:41:51 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01C58EE17B; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:41:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1591393310; bh=48ApKiNXm1HVa5YUU3DA6ohP4QLZPkpj74quohwZYgg=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Y0H7ex29UCo8zPQYDi5nCfRpjQWAm775FNM/UFgVrZh8rLlEge0bx+egKbRxEdFsF CY0SlgpElW2MMZHaVxCQ2EGsnkoXF+Liw172+53rQ+Du4in2k3oDMlgSsQksCkvN7p 8OpMbLJvv5TRPstNgVE4jVP+fBLHNzwTOp6IuZJw= Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92iVsJ_6Q6Tk; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [153.66.254.194] (unknown [50.35.76.230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06C268EE0CE; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:41:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1591393310; bh=48ApKiNXm1HVa5YUU3DA6ohP4QLZPkpj74quohwZYgg=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Y0H7ex29UCo8zPQYDi5nCfRpjQWAm775FNM/UFgVrZh8rLlEge0bx+egKbRxEdFsF CY0SlgpElW2MMZHaVxCQ2EGsnkoXF+Liw172+53rQ+Du4in2k3oDMlgSsQksCkvN7p 8OpMbLJvv5TRPstNgVE4jVP+fBLHNzwTOp6IuZJw= Message-ID: <1591393308.4728.100.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] first round of SCSI updates for the 5.6+ merge window From: James Bottomley To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-scsi , linux-kernel Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 14:41:48 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1591332925.3685.16.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1591391891.4728.96.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 14:25 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 2:18 PM James Bottomley > wrote: > > > > Um, no, shuffles feet ... I actually tagged the wrong branch: > > Ok, now I see the changes, but I see more than you reported. > > These seem to be new compared to your pull request: > > Al Viro (4): > scsi: hpsa: Lift {BIG_,}IOCTL_Command_struct copy{in,out} into > hpsa_ioctl() > scsi: hpsa: Don't bother with vmalloc for > BIG_IOCTL_Command_struct > scsi: hpsa: Get rid of compat_alloc_user_space() > scsi: hpsa: hpsa_ioctl(): Tidy up a bit > > Can Guo (1): > scsi: ufs: Don't update urgent bkops level when toggling auto > bkops > > Stanley Chu (1): > scsi: ufs: Remove redundant urgent_bkop_lvl initialization > > They don't look alarming, but I don't like how I don't see what you > _claim_ I should see. > > Hmm? Ah right, my MO is to do the first push and then start gathering for the second. pushing the tag again picked up the new stuff I've been gathering. Let me rewind the tag back to where it was for the original push and then try again. Done. You should now see no stray additional patches on the scsi-misc tag. Sorry again, I believe I've actually fully verified the diffstat matches this time ... (famous last words ..) James