From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Grubb Subject: Re: signed tarballs Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:03:54 -0400 Message-ID: <1591540.lCI4k97X9x@x2> References: <20170406233134.GA32113@motoko> <3197080.UOV2hoHuAT@x2> <20170411104403.GB386@motoko> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170411104403.GB386@motoko> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com To: Christian Rebischke Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com List-Id: linux-audit@redhat.com On Tuesday, April 11, 2017 6:44:13 AM EDT Christian Rebischke wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 02:35:31PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > > Nobody has ever asked for one. I literally build the package in Fedora > > within a few minutes of a release. Fedora has hashes of the audit tar > > file in the "sources" file in the build system in case you want any > > historical information: > > > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/audit.git/log/sources > > Hello Steve, > well.. then I want to ask you if you could use gpg signatures in future > for your releases. We, at arch linux, are currently encouraging upstream > to use signed releases and https. It's just 5min of work and it's a big > step to a more secure internet. Thanks. I added a sha256sum to the release announcement yesterday. You can also access the people page via https. -Steve