All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize io_kiocb's result" failed to apply to 5.7-stable tree
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:48:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15928481127127@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 5.7-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From bbde017a32b32d2fa8d5fddca25fade20132abf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 02:06:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize io_kiocb's result
 and iopoll_completed

In io_complete_rw_iopoll(), stores to io_kiocb's result and iopoll
completed are two independent store operations, to ensure that once
iopoll_completed is ture and then req->result must been perceived by
the cpu executing io_do_iopoll(), proper memory barrier should be used.

And in io_do_iopoll(), we check whether req->result is EAGAIN, if it is,
we'll need to issue this io request using io-wq again. In order to just
issue a single smp_rmb() on the completion side, move the re-submit work
to io_iopoll_complete().

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
[axboe: don't set ->iopoll_completed for -EAGAIN retry]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index eb3797714539..9d2ae9aa8b45 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -1742,6 +1742,18 @@ static int io_put_kbuf(struct io_kiocb *req)
 	return cflags;
 }
 
+static void io_iopoll_queue(struct list_head *again)
+{
+	struct io_kiocb *req;
+
+	do {
+		req = list_first_entry(again, struct io_kiocb, list);
+		list_del(&req->list);
+		refcount_inc(&req->refs);
+		io_queue_async_work(req);
+	} while (!list_empty(again));
+}
+
 /*
  * Find and free completed poll iocbs
  */
@@ -1750,12 +1762,21 @@ static void io_iopoll_complete(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
 {
 	struct req_batch rb;
 	struct io_kiocb *req;
+	LIST_HEAD(again);
+
+	/* order with ->result store in io_complete_rw_iopoll() */
+	smp_rmb();
 
 	rb.to_free = rb.need_iter = 0;
 	while (!list_empty(done)) {
 		int cflags = 0;
 
 		req = list_first_entry(done, struct io_kiocb, list);
+		if (READ_ONCE(req->result) == -EAGAIN) {
+			req->iopoll_completed = 0;
+			list_move_tail(&req->list, &again);
+			continue;
+		}
 		list_del(&req->list);
 
 		if (req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED)
@@ -1773,18 +1794,9 @@ static void io_iopoll_complete(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
 	if (ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL)
 		io_cqring_ev_posted(ctx);
 	io_free_req_many(ctx, &rb);
-}
-
-static void io_iopoll_queue(struct list_head *again)
-{
-	struct io_kiocb *req;
 
-	do {
-		req = list_first_entry(again, struct io_kiocb, list);
-		list_del(&req->list);
-		refcount_inc(&req->refs);
-		io_queue_async_work(req);
-	} while (!list_empty(again));
+	if (!list_empty(&again))
+		io_iopoll_queue(&again);
 }
 
 static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
@@ -1792,7 +1804,6 @@ static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
 {
 	struct io_kiocb *req, *tmp;
 	LIST_HEAD(done);
-	LIST_HEAD(again);
 	bool spin;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -1818,13 +1829,6 @@ static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
 		if (!list_empty(&done))
 			break;
 
-		if (req->result == -EAGAIN) {
-			list_move_tail(&req->list, &again);
-			continue;
-		}
-		if (!list_empty(&again))
-			break;
-
 		ret = kiocb->ki_filp->f_op->iopoll(kiocb, spin);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			break;
@@ -1837,9 +1841,6 @@ static int io_do_iopoll(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned int *nr_events,
 	if (!list_empty(&done))
 		io_iopoll_complete(ctx, nr_events, &done);
 
-	if (!list_empty(&again))
-		io_iopoll_queue(&again);
-
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1990,9 +1991,13 @@ static void io_complete_rw_iopoll(struct kiocb *kiocb, long res, long res2)
 
 	if (res != -EAGAIN && res != req->result)
 		req_set_fail_links(req);
-	req->result = res;
-	if (res != -EAGAIN)
+
+	WRITE_ONCE(req->result, res);
+	/* order with io_poll_complete() checking ->result */
+	if (res != -EAGAIN) {
+		smp_wmb();
 		WRITE_ONCE(req->iopoll_completed, 1);
+	}
 }
 
 /*


             reply	other threads:[~2020-06-22 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-22 17:48 gregkh [this message]
2020-06-22 18:02 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: add memory barrier to synchronize io_kiocb's result" failed to apply to 5.7-stable tree Jens Axboe
2020-06-22 18:09   ` Greg KH
2020-06-22 18:12     ` Jens Axboe
2020-06-22 18:19       ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15928481127127@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoguang.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.