From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756162AbaCLAwo (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Mar 2014 20:52:44 -0400 Received: from mail.efficios.com ([78.47.125.74]:47194 "EHLO mail.efficios.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756121AbaCLAwa (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Mar 2014 20:52:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:52:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Frederic Weisbecker , Andrew Morton Message-ID: <1594586075.484.1394585553228.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> In-Reply-To: <20140311193450.60bbf8b0@gandalf.local.home> References: <1394499898-1537-1-git-send-email-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> <20140311193450.60bbf8b0@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tracepoint API doc update: data argument MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [206.248.138.119] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.5_GA_5839 (ZimbraWebClient - FF27 (Linux)/8.0.5_GA_5839) Thread-Topic: Tracepoint API doc update: data argument Thread-Index: IMju1Jw7c0wuODwSbU0t5TQNfMCRog== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steven Rostedt" > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" , "Frederic Weisbecker" , > "Andrew Morton" > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 7:34:50 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tracepoint API doc update: data argument > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:04:57 -0400 > Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > Describe the @data argument (probe private data). > > > > Fixes: 38516ab59fbc "tracing: Let tracepoints have data passed to > > tracepoint callbacks" > > CC: Steven Rostedt > > CC: Ingo Molnar > > CC: Frederic Weisbecker > > CC: Andrew Morton > > No signed-off-by. Hi Steven, I'm curious to understand the reason of this "no signed-off-by" on a trivial patch that fixes the missing DocBook comments for one of your previous commits that has been upstream for a few years. What am I missing ? Perhaps you meant this reply for my other documentation update patch (2/2) ? Thanks, Mathieu > > -- Steve > > -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com