diff for duplicates of <1594777309.12900.237.camel@linux.ibm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index cd31bb2..7647207 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -7,16 +7,16 @@ On Thu, 2020-07-02 at 11:35 -0400, Lachlan Sneff wrote: > Signed-off-by: Lachlan Sneff <t-josne@linux.microsoft.com> Depending on the policy, the measurement list could be exactly the -same from one boot to the next. This test simply checks that the -first N number of measurements are the same. It doesn't verify that +same from one boot to the next. ?This test simply checks that the +first N number of measurements are the same. ?It doesn't verify that there are additional measurements, nor does it check that there is an -additional "boot_aggregate" after the kexec. At minimum the test +additional "boot_aggregate" after the kexec. ?At minimum the test should verify the existence of multiple "boot_aggregate" values in the measurement list. A more complete test would walk the measurement list, re-calculating the PCR digests, and then compare the recalculated PCRS against the -TPM PCRs. If all the measurements were properly carried across the +TPM PCRs. ?If all the measurements were properly carried across the kexec, the PCR digests should match. Mimi diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index d85f753..a92613b 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,14 +1,9 @@ "ref\020200702153545.3126-1-t-josne@linux.microsoft.com\0" "ref\020200702153545.3126-3-t-josne@linux.microsoft.com\0" "From\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 2/2] IMA: Verify IMA buffer passing through the kexec barrier\0" + "Subject\0[LTP] [PATCH 2/2] IMA: Verify IMA buffer passing through the kexec barrier\0" "Date\0Tue, 14 Jul 2020 21:41:49 -0400\0" - "To\0Lachlan Sneff <t-josne@linux.microsoft.com>" - pvorel@suse.cz - " ltp@lists.linux.it\0" - "Cc\0nramas@linux.microsoft.com" - balajib@linux.microsoft.com - " linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org\0" + "To\0ltp@lists.linux.it\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Thu, 2020-07-02 at 11:35 -0400, Lachlan Sneff wrote:\n" @@ -20,18 +15,18 @@ "> Signed-off-by: Lachlan Sneff <t-josne@linux.microsoft.com>\n" "\n" "Depending on the policy, the measurement list could be exactly the\n" - "same from one boot to the next. \302\240This test simply checks that the\n" - "first N number of measurements are the same. \302\240It doesn't verify that\n" + "same from one boot to the next. ?This test simply checks that the\n" + "first N number of measurements are the same. ?It doesn't verify that\n" "there are additional measurements, nor does it check that there is an\n" - "additional \"boot_aggregate\" after the kexec. \302\240At minimum the test\n" + "additional \"boot_aggregate\" after the kexec. ?At minimum the test\n" "should verify the existence of multiple \"boot_aggregate\" values in the\n" "measurement list.\n" "\n" "A more complete test would walk the measurement list, re-calculating\n" "the PCR digests, and then compare the recalculated PCRS against the\n" - "TPM PCRs. \302\240If all the measurements were properly carried across the\n" + "TPM PCRs. ?If all the measurements were properly carried across the\n" "kexec, the PCR digests should match.\n" "\n" Mimi -cd43f17cbe5917c858040b36559b929d3f5fb27ae7947e9107b150cd0759410f +2add6527e80b1c4053d64c3c93102f7cee3c319f496ad366202945cb76218c90
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.