All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1595426682.5311.83.camel@linux.ibm.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index cf92ebd..c048400 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 14:24 -0400, Lachlan Sneff wrote:
 > +# code, but, after investigating that possiblity, it appears to be
 > +# quite difficult (and would require a new faux kernel for each arch).
 
-The comment formatting is inconsistent.  Please correct.
+The comment formatting is inconsistent. ?Please correct.
 
 > +IMAGE="/boot/vmlinuz-$(uname -r)"
 > +if [ ! -f $IMAGE ]; then
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ The comment formatting is inconsistent.  Please correct.
 > +    fi
 
 Most likely one of the reasons for the kexec to fail is that the
-kernel image isn't properly signed.  How about checking the secure-
+kernel image isn't properly signed. ?How about checking the secure-
 boot status to provide some contextual information.
 
 > +
@@ -87,13 +87,13 @@ boot status to provide some contextual information.
 > +        tst_brk TFAIL "kexec cmdline was measured incorrectly"
 > +    fi
 
-This assumes that a kexec command line measurement was found.  The
+This assumes that a kexec command line measurement was found. ?The
 output needs to differentiate between no measurement and an invalid
-measurement.  In the case that the rule doesn't exist, at that point
-you have a choice of skipping the test or extending the IMA policy. 
+measurement. ?In the case that the rule doesn't exist, at that point
+you have a choice of skipping the test or extending the IMA policy.?
 
 The kernel kexec selftests checks both the Kconfig and the IMA runtime
-policy.  Different testing infrastructures have different policies
+policy. ?Different testing infrastructures have different policies
 about basing tests on them.
 
 > +
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 381bd78..7935a65 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,13 +1,8 @@
  "ref\020200721182440.4169-1-t-josne@linux.microsoft.com\0"
  "From\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] IMA: Add test for kexec cmdline measurement\0"
+ "Subject\0[LTP] [PATCH] IMA: Add test for kexec cmdline measurement\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:04:42 -0400\0"
- "To\0Lachlan Sneff <t-josne@linux.microsoft.com>"
-  pvorel@suse.cz
- " ltp@lists.linux.it\0"
- "Cc\0nramas@linux.microsoft.com"
-  balajib@linux.microsoft.com
- " linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org\0"
+ "To\0ltp@lists.linux.it\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 14:24 -0400, Lachlan Sneff wrote:\n"
@@ -52,7 +47,7 @@
  "> +# code, but, after investigating that possiblity, it appears to be\n"
  "> +# quite difficult (and would require a new faux kernel for each arch).\n"
  "\n"
- "The comment formatting is inconsistent. \302\240Please correct.\n"
+ "The comment formatting is inconsistent. ?Please correct.\n"
  "\n"
  "> +IMAGE=\"/boot/vmlinuz-$(uname -r)\"\n"
  "> +if [ ! -f $IMAGE ]; then\n"
@@ -91,7 +86,7 @@
  "> +    fi\n"
  "\n"
  "Most likely one of the reasons for the kexec to fail is that the\n"
- "kernel image isn't properly signed. \302\240How about checking the secure-\n"
+ "kernel image isn't properly signed. ?How about checking the secure-\n"
  "boot status to provide some contextual information.\n"
  "\n"
  "> +\n"
@@ -99,13 +94,13 @@
  "> +        tst_brk TFAIL \"kexec cmdline was measured incorrectly\"\n"
  "> +    fi\n"
  "\n"
- "This assumes that a kexec command line measurement was found. \302\240The\n"
+ "This assumes that a kexec command line measurement was found. ?The\n"
  "output needs to differentiate between no measurement and an invalid\n"
- "measurement. \302\240In the case that the rule doesn't exist, at that point\n"
- "you have a choice of skipping the test or extending the IMA policy.\302\240\n"
+ "measurement. ?In the case that the rule doesn't exist, at that point\n"
+ "you have a choice of skipping the test or extending the IMA policy.?\n"
  "\n"
  "The kernel kexec selftests checks both the Kconfig and the IMA runtime\n"
- "policy. \302\240Different testing infrastructures have different policies\n"
+ "policy. ?Different testing infrastructures have different policies\n"
  "about basing tests on them.\n"
  "\n"
  "> +\n"
@@ -141,4 +136,4 @@
  "> +\n"
  > +tst_run
 
-6d6f994bd9f7fa6938872863a6038f5be73a690dcd5e4d40c35dd2132600655f
+ed693e77c88458666179c41175d9a58b530453d5262a2b4f4fe754e8b24458de

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.