From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B395EC433DF for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958C7208E4 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726535AbgGVSKC (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:10:02 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:36912 "EHLO mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726736AbgGVSKB (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:10:01 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06MI3BvU158881; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:09:55 -0400 Received: from ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (48.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.72]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32e1vs4u1m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:09:55 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06MI7Dms030353; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:09:53 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma06fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 32brbgtqn4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:09:53 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 06MI9pEW62259306 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:09:51 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F089BAE057; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:09:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE4EAE053; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:09:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.219.44]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:09:49 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <1595441389.5211.1.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] IMA: Add test for kexec cmdline measurement From: Mimi Zohar To: Lachlan Sneff , pvorel@suse.cz, ltp@lists.linux.it Cc: nramas@linux.microsoft.com, balajib@linux.microsoft.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:09:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200722164040.23109-1-t-josne@linux.microsoft.com> References: <20200722164040.23109-1-t-josne@linux.microsoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-22_10:2020-07-22,2020-07-22 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2007220114 Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 12:40 -0400, Lachlan Sneff wrote: > IMA policy can be set to measure the command line passed in the kexec system call. > There needs to be a test to validate this kexec command line measurement. > > Add a testcase that verifies that the IMA subsystem has correctly > measured the cmdline specified during a kexec. > > Note that this test does not actually reboot. > > Signed-off-by: Lachlan Sneff Other than the patch not applying cleanly and leading blanks,  Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mimi Zohar Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:09:49 -0400 Subject: [LTP] [PATCH v2] IMA: Add test for kexec cmdline measurement In-Reply-To: <20200722164040.23109-1-t-josne@linux.microsoft.com> References: <20200722164040.23109-1-t-josne@linux.microsoft.com> Message-ID: <1595441389.5211.1.camel@linux.ibm.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ltp@lists.linux.it On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 12:40 -0400, Lachlan Sneff wrote: > IMA policy can be set to measure the command line passed in the kexec system call. > There needs to be a test to validate this kexec command line measurement. > > Add a testcase that verifies that the IMA subsystem has correctly > measured the cmdline specified during a kexec. > > Note that this test does not actually reboot. > > Signed-off-by: Lachlan Sneff Other than the patch not applying cleanly and leading blanks,? Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar