Re: [PATCH 2/6] rtlwifi: Remove unnecessary parenthese in rtl_dbg uses

[Pkshih <pkshih@realtek.com>]

On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 01:27 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 06:07 +0000, Pkshih wrote:
> > On Sat, 2020-07-25 at 12:55 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Make these statements a little simpler.
> []
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtcoutsrc.c
> []
> > > @@ -874,11 +874,10 @@ static void halbtc_display_wifi_status(struct
> > > btc_coexist *btcoexist,
> > >  	seq_printf(m, "\n %-35s = %s / %s/ %s/ AP=%d ",
> > >  		   "Wifi freq/ bw/ traffic",
> > >  		   gl_btc_wifi_freq_string[wifi_freq],
> > > -		   ((wifi_under_b_mode) ? "11b" :
> > > -		    gl_btc_wifi_bw_string[wifi_bw]),
> > > -		   ((!wifi_busy) ? "idle" : ((BTC_WIFI_TRAFFIC_TX ==
> > > -					      wifi_traffic_dir) ?
> "uplink" :
> > > -					     "downlink")),
> > > +		   wifi_under_b_mode ? "11b" :
> gl_btc_wifi_bw_string[wifi_bw],
> > > +		   (!wifi_busy ? "idle" :
> > > +		    wifi_traffic_dir == BTC_WIFI_TRAFFIC_TX ? "uplink" :
> > > +		    "downlink"),
> > 
> > I think this would be better
> > 
> > +		   !wifi_busy ? "idle" :
> > +		   (wifi_traffic_dir == BTC_WIFI_TRAFFIC_TX ? "uplink" :
> > +		    "downlink"),
> 
> It seems most repeated test1 ? : test2 ? : test3 ?:
> uses do not have the style you suggest in the kernel.
> 

Your change is 
(test1 ? : test2 ? :)

So, I think you would like to have parenthesis intentionally.
If so, 
test1 ? : (test2 ? :)
would be better.


If not,
test1 ? : test2 ? :
may be what you want (without any parenthesis).