From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92646C433E0 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 11:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E075206F6 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 11:47:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1596282423; bh=04agM21RShVFUsopyjAxNa4Z/crvlXg97ELg/cggvHE=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:List-ID:From; b=HGgJRtwgcb8r92mZ5YgysGoMBTvU+cxt62lhMJ+Nw+2tUPjllr/+r6hhhZ0XD0X7G jiR2TyIBpLBzWA1uCpmV2VmXWLemySb/HORW+cZczipG8utno/By5Y7h8/VYTZFeLC 4dcawWAXEHhXhJ+s4P8D/xl1FcbGarISzS5dAaDo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728814AbgHALrC (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Aug 2020 07:47:02 -0400 Received: from wforward2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.31]:37571 "EHLO wforward2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726808AbgHALrC (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Aug 2020 07:47:02 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailforward.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974EC762; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 07:47:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 01 Aug 2020 07:47:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Nx2i1H uHEXt7ju0QUGlEiLzFGEDHH1oFd7LnR3QpbvI=; b=twm0TmIgmrz4owO8deisQ4 k8Bj2V7cDh4RC3ST6VsghqGBzi1hBwBxxtNQzVQKUoMg+c71qSVin6wVOO9fQE5W /BYjT9dO6uJWpoERBrMkkBfbI4Et9GSMU+zgTAHApssXBm0RXKfcu02uf2U7vkRU G0oPLydQWObA0a2+RXan/Iq/39jHQILZ3Hh2UZru7fsW36zKoJcgsxU5JaasSEIV BzM6ZVU1es/fpqJih2/0d0Qcu9C/mGeyomr3X55RvEQyTk7k1NoYdsNFlMQmhc8R +WLGMzRStDzAPM7l9k1NVvM1jr6sqnaFBItL/z9b4g7uZ9iY8iUQNDkm3S7PcDTQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrjedtgdeghecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvhfffkfggtgfgsehtkeertddttd flnecuhfhrohhmpeeoghhrvghgkhhhsehlihhnuhigfhhouhhnuggrthhiohhnrdhorhhg qeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelleelvdegfeelledtteegudegfffghfduffduudekge efleegieegkeejhfelveenucffohhmrghinhepkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgnecukfhppeek fedrkeeirdekledruddtjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmh grihhlfhhrohhmpehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D5B35328005E; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 07:47:00 -0400 (EDT) Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] 9p/trans_fd: Fix concurrency del of req_list in" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree To: wanghai38@huawei.com, asmadeus@codewreck.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: From: Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 13:46:34 +0200 Message-ID: <1596282394253233@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to . thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 74d6a5d5662975aed7f25952f62efbb6f6dadd29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wang Hai Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:08:33 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] 9p/trans_fd: Fix concurrency del of req_list in p9_fd_cancelled/p9_read_work p9_read_work and p9_fd_cancelled may be called concurrently. In some cases, req->req_list may be deleted by both p9_read_work and p9_fd_cancelled. We can fix it by ignoring replies associated with a cancelled request and ignoring cancelled request if message has been received before lock. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200612090833.36149-1-wanghai38@huawei.com Fixes: 60ff779c4abb ("9p: client: remove unused code and any reference to "cancelled" function") Cc: # v3.12+ Reported-by: syzbot+77a25acfa0382e06ab23@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Wang Hai Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet diff --git a/net/9p/trans_fd.c b/net/9p/trans_fd.c index 9c9196d30a59..12ecacf0c55f 100644 --- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c +++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c @@ -362,6 +362,10 @@ static void p9_read_work(struct work_struct *work) if (m->rreq->status == REQ_STATUS_SENT) { list_del(&m->rreq->req_list); p9_client_cb(m->client, m->rreq, REQ_STATUS_RCVD); + } else if (m->rreq->status == REQ_STATUS_FLSHD) { + /* Ignore replies associated with a cancelled request. */ + p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_TRANS, + "Ignore replies associated with a cancelled request\n"); } else { spin_unlock(&m->client->lock); p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, @@ -703,11 +707,20 @@ static int p9_fd_cancelled(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req) { p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_TRANS, "client %p req %p\n", client, req); + spin_lock(&client->lock); + /* Ignore cancelled request if message has been received + * before lock. + */ + if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_RCVD) { + spin_unlock(&client->lock); + return 0; + } + /* we haven't received a response for oldreq, * remove it from the list. */ - spin_lock(&client->lock); list_del(&req->req_list); + req->status = REQ_STATUS_FLSHD; spin_unlock(&client->lock); p9_req_put(req);