From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEBDC433E1 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 13:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0FF20866 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 13:30:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1596807018; bh=lDVL7x51PEWUgmJGLDEAGYsnJISSi+CUwNkh2frrW1s=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:List-ID:From; b=jvjnxj8FsHPC84I7ils+gZzwZzQhJItbbf8TuT3Ju9J7lBSCyEqU7m1gKPNsc3igq aFv7Ix4+VQOihxpTurn8RI3VEG/iHIom08KsnGlYbHSSnpBC5jit34uhHBQa5OTYGX 7KlU2XT/WnH3ohCXySIDWquT9Urrau+Qjkb/+LuM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726076AbgHGNaQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:30:16 -0400 Received: from forward2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.226]:48345 "EHLO forward2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726167AbgHGNaB (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:30:01 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailforward.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFE81940771; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:29:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 07 Aug 2020 09:29:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=ibWEpU 7+iwsNDzofn/aPZp52OPDhI2zxBvK17pYz2r8=; b=bY7YhzzchIrRi1NbVNJv0P 4EcVvDnFpOve46cdxtT5iJmEzNRQIaqDoxzs7UfMLjBR+wPzO3bkhg1yQCjsvJwN ezTgwPfTU/7SF3OwGzaqE6jtDmRRzKrzRmgWXXliQt3HdQGXNXk8+5MMe6QJEUUB 5/BzB73sas0A+GIwCRjmUK7Xid2tNXcizETiysf28HlVT2eUu6PqhSwA7Yxke0JS v/mzE59CflqzcMkCuZVVEUc3Z20DEf6j65Du8FLinH+TiHo+YUHM3FuI+qKSufFn IjU3T+6DAygQPKhX5ahxmfKESeOtT31hcMOVx+jhVX9N+A2K/NB1O3PKL/n4pF4Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrkedvgdeiiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvhfffkfggtgfgsehtkeertddttd ejnecuhfhrohhmpeeoghhrvghgkhhhsehlihhnuhigfhhouhhnuggrthhiohhnrdhorhhg qeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvffegjeejiedtieffjeeijeffgfehvdeiudejheefge evhffhvedvfeeuheekleenucffohhmrghinhepfhhrvggvuggvshhkthhophdrohhrghen ucfkphepkeefrdekiedrkeelrddutdejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrg hrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3F8733060067; Fri, 7 Aug 2020 09:29:51 -0400 (EDT) Subject: WTF: patch "[PATCH] drm/mgag200: Remove declaration of mgag200_mmap() from header" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree? To: tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@redhat.com, alexander.deucher@amd.com, armijn@tjaldur.nl, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, emil.velikov@collabora.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kraxel@redhat.com, krzk@kernel.org, noralf@tronnes.org, sam@ravnborg.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de Cc: From: Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 15:30:05 +0200 Message-ID: <159680700523135@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree. I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst. I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to and let me know why this patch should be applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be seen again. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 1d8d42ba365101fa68d210c0e2ed2bc9582fda6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Zimmermann Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:57:50 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] drm/mgag200: Remove declaration of mgag200_mmap() from header file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Commit 94668ac796a5 ("drm/mgag200: Convert mgag200 driver to VRAM MM") removed the implementation of mgag200_mmap(). Also remove the declaration. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg Fixes: 94668ac796a5 ("drm/mgag200: Convert mgag200 driver to VRAM MM") Cc: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Dave Airlie Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "Noralf Trønnes" Cc: Armijn Hemel Cc: Alex Deucher Cc: Emil Velikov Cc: # v5.3+ Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200605135803.19811-2-tzimmermann@suse.de diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h index 47df62b1ad29..92b6679029fe 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h @@ -198,6 +198,5 @@ void mgag200_i2c_destroy(struct mga_i2c_chan *i2c); int mgag200_mm_init(struct mga_device *mdev); void mgag200_mm_fini(struct mga_device *mdev); -int mgag200_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma); #endif /* __MGAG200_DRV_H__ */