From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: sanitize double poll handling" failed to apply to 5.7-stable tree
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:43:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1597660994188250@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.7-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From d4e7cd36a90e38e0276d6ce0c20f5ccef17ec38c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 11:44:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: sanitize double poll handling
There's a bit of confusion on the matching pairs of poll vs double poll,
depending on if the request is a pure poll (IORING_OP_POLL_ADD) or
poll driven retry.
Add io_poll_get_double() that returns the double poll waitqueue, if any,
and io_poll_get_single() that returns the original poll waitqueue. With
that, remove the argument to io_poll_remove_double().
Finally ensure that wait->private is cleared once the double poll handler
has run, so that remove knows it's already been seen.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.8
Reported-by: syzbot+7f617d4a9369028b8a2c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 18bceab101ad ("io_uring: allow POLL_ADD with double poll_wait() users")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 7dd6df15bc49..cb030912bf5e 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -4649,9 +4649,24 @@ static bool io_poll_rewait(struct io_kiocb *req, struct io_poll_iocb *poll)
return false;
}
-static void io_poll_remove_double(struct io_kiocb *req, void *data)
+static struct io_poll_iocb *io_poll_get_double(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
- struct io_poll_iocb *poll = data;
+ /* pure poll stashes this in ->io, poll driven retry elsewhere */
+ if (req->opcode == IORING_OP_POLL_ADD)
+ return (struct io_poll_iocb *) req->io;
+ return req->apoll->double_poll;
+}
+
+static struct io_poll_iocb *io_poll_get_single(struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
+ if (req->opcode == IORING_OP_POLL_ADD)
+ return &req->poll;
+ return &req->apoll->poll;
+}
+
+static void io_poll_remove_double(struct io_kiocb *req)
+{
+ struct io_poll_iocb *poll = io_poll_get_double(req);
lockdep_assert_held(&req->ctx->completion_lock);
@@ -4671,7 +4686,7 @@ static void io_poll_complete(struct io_kiocb *req, __poll_t mask, int error)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
- io_poll_remove_double(req, req->io);
+ io_poll_remove_double(req);
req->poll.done = true;
io_cqring_fill_event(req, error ? error : mangle_poll(mask));
io_commit_cqring(ctx);
@@ -4711,7 +4726,7 @@ static int io_poll_double_wake(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode,
int sync, void *key)
{
struct io_kiocb *req = wait->private;
- struct io_poll_iocb *poll = req->apoll->double_poll;
+ struct io_poll_iocb *poll = io_poll_get_single(req);
__poll_t mask = key_to_poll(key);
/* for instances that support it check for an event match first: */
@@ -4725,6 +4740,8 @@ static int io_poll_double_wake(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode,
done = list_empty(&poll->wait.entry);
if (!done)
list_del_init(&poll->wait.entry);
+ /* make sure double remove sees this as being gone */
+ wait->private = NULL;
spin_unlock(&poll->head->lock);
if (!done)
__io_async_wake(req, poll, mask, io_poll_task_func);
@@ -4808,7 +4825,7 @@ static void io_async_task_func(struct callback_head *cb)
if (hash_hashed(&req->hash_node))
hash_del(&req->hash_node);
- io_poll_remove_double(req, apoll->double_poll);
+ io_poll_remove_double(req);
spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
if (!READ_ONCE(apoll->poll.canceled))
@@ -4919,7 +4936,7 @@ static bool io_arm_poll_handler(struct io_kiocb *req)
ret = __io_arm_poll_handler(req, &apoll->poll, &ipt, mask,
io_async_wake);
if (ret || ipt.error) {
- io_poll_remove_double(req, apoll->double_poll);
+ io_poll_remove_double(req);
spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->completion_lock);
kfree(apoll->double_poll);
kfree(apoll);
@@ -4951,14 +4968,13 @@ static bool io_poll_remove_one(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
bool do_complete;
+ io_poll_remove_double(req);
+
if (req->opcode == IORING_OP_POLL_ADD) {
- io_poll_remove_double(req, req->io);
do_complete = __io_poll_remove_one(req, &req->poll);
} else {
struct async_poll *apoll = req->apoll;
- io_poll_remove_double(req, apoll->double_poll);
-
/* non-poll requests have submit ref still */
do_complete = __io_poll_remove_one(req, &apoll->poll);
if (do_complete) {
next reply other threads:[~2020-08-17 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-17 10:43 gregkh [this message]
2020-08-17 13:15 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: sanitize double poll handling" failed to apply to 5.7-stable tree Jens Axboe
2020-08-17 13:39 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1597660994188250@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.