FAILED: patch "[PATCH] bcache: avoid nr_stripes overflow in bcache_device_init()" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 65f0f017e7be8c70330372df23bcb2a407ecf02d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 20:00:21 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] bcache: avoid nr_stripes overflow in bcache_device_init()

For some block devices which large capacity (e.g. 8TB) but small io_opt
size (e.g. 8 sectors), in bcache_device_init() the stripes number calcu-
lated by,
	DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(sectors, d->stripe_size);
might be overflow to the unsigned int bcache_device->nr_stripes.

This patch uses the uint64_t variable to store DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL()
and after the value is checked to be available in unsigned int range,
sets it to bache_device->nr_stripes. Then the overflow is avoided.

Reported-and-tested-by: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783075
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
index 4a77bfd4009f..0f90616dc8d3 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
@@ -835,19 +835,19 @@ static int bcache_device_init(struct bcache_device *d, unsigned int block_size,
 	struct request_queue *q;
 	const size_t max_stripes = min_t(size_t, INT_MAX,
 					 SIZE_MAX / sizeof(atomic_t));
-	size_t n;
+	uint64_t n;
 	int idx;
 
 	if (!d->stripe_size)
 		d->stripe_size = 1 << 31;
 
-	d->nr_stripes = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(sectors, d->stripe_size);
-
-	if (!d->nr_stripes || d->nr_stripes > max_stripes) {
-		pr_err("nr_stripes too large or invalid: %u (start sector beyond end of disk?)\n",
-			(unsigned int)d->nr_stripes);
+	n = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(sectors, d->stripe_size);
+	if (!n || n > max_stripes) {
+		pr_err("nr_stripes too large or invalid: %llu (start sector beyond end of disk?)\n",
+			n);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
+	d->nr_stripes = n;
 
 	n = d->nr_stripes * sizeof(atomic_t);
 	d->stripe_sectors_dirty = kvzalloc(n, GFP_KERNEL);