From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: haokexin@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] tracing/hwlat: Honor the tracing_cpumask" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:30:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1597840205103185@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 96b4833b6827a62c295b149213c68b559514c929 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:23:18 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] tracing/hwlat: Honor the tracing_cpumask
In calculation of the cpu mask for the hwlat kernel thread, the wrong
cpu mask is used instead of the tracing_cpumask, this causes the
tracing/tracing_cpumask useless for hwlat tracer. Fixes it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200730082318.42584-2-haokexin@gmail.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 0330f7aa8ee6 ("tracing: Have hwlat trace migrate across tracing_cpumask CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
index ddb528a6cd51..17873e5d0353 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
@@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ static bool disable_migrate;
static void move_to_next_cpu(void)
{
struct cpumask *current_mask = &save_cpumask;
+ struct trace_array *tr = hwlat_trace;
int next_cpu;
if (disable_migrate)
@@ -296,7 +297,7 @@ static void move_to_next_cpu(void)
goto disable;
get_online_cpus();
- cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, tracing_buffer_mask);
+ cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, tr->tracing_cpumask);
next_cpu = cpumask_next(smp_processor_id(), current_mask);
put_online_cpus();
@@ -372,7 +373,7 @@ static int start_kthread(struct trace_array *tr)
/* Just pick the first CPU on first iteration */
get_online_cpus();
- cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, tracing_buffer_mask);
+ cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, tr->tracing_cpumask);
put_online_cpus();
next_cpu = cpumask_first(current_mask);
reply other threads:[~2020-08-19 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1597840205103185@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=haokexin@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.