From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D425C433DF for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 08:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2D0207FB for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 08:32:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597912376; bh=lDVL7x51PEWUgmJGLDEAGYsnJISSi+CUwNkh2frrW1s=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:List-ID:From; b=UZHmDwCK94y17Yi+P30Xw2xAArgHRHQVuhP1fQQTjSCA63Sjs15mjvDDodAqkaKLe 4F2O9uUr2usEX1VOazTS86WQPl8kbdLJJBKc79PN3YE3wSHyW+K6HSFU7ippvt0S96 WzpwLZJmZNB0Y7H+dC/uWS0uUlXyf4yFpsbWDGRI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726788AbgHTIc4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2020 04:32:56 -0400 Received: from forward2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.226]:48693 "EHLO forward2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725852AbgHTIcy (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2020 04:32:54 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailforward.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2297194008D; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 04:32:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 20 Aug 2020 04:32:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=ibWEpU 7+iwsNDzofn/aPZp52OPDhI2zxBvK17pYz2r8=; b=RpMknMG5/qHvJG+U0VCFoy vexiYMkYqS5RsbDR8NCiAdybdwDy7cD9xKoADFOdRHv8IrLGQloqlGK115cIXoSw +z+mTmLCKX3CMVyqmOU9s6opASruDeTZ+YX/BmHY5hM1iPWSCiyIxuoe8v0vLcoR ZOoRnTbWdjgIPiqv4VwTFOPfRlbThXJF1wp/Z5HTB5uKMZXR0H0KP35p6lbrYCv5 1Jrl1zcciXRf0iQwVnDCI+RYmgK4hxCrsp0hzQFY1CDIglYX6lvrjB7Af7TXKuD6 2N1gXtKiTb3L193S2d0Cn8uXgLgua2zwxvzXaJ+MxlSXMZaHL2E62yTodHuVF+qQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedruddutddgtddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvffhfffkgggtgfesthekredttd dtjeenucfhrhhomhepoehgrhgvghhkhheslhhinhhugihfohhunhgurghtihhonhdrohhr gheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvdffgeejjeeitdeiffejieejfffghedviedujeehfe egvefhhfevvdefueehkeelnecuffhomhgrihhnpehfrhgvvgguvghskhhtohhprdhorhhg necukfhppeekfedrkeeirdekledruddtjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5E9B0328005A; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 04:32:51 -0400 (EDT) Subject: WTF: patch "[PATCH] drm/mgag200: Remove declaration of mgag200_mmap() from header" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree? To: tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@redhat.com, alexander.deucher@amd.com, armijn@tjaldur.nl, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, emil.velikov@collabora.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kraxel@redhat.com, krzk@kernel.org, noralf@tronnes.org, sam@ravnborg.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de Cc: From: Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:33:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1597912392179121@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 5.8-stable tree. I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst. I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to and let me know why this patch should be applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be seen again. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 1d8d42ba365101fa68d210c0e2ed2bc9582fda6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Zimmermann Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 15:57:50 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] drm/mgag200: Remove declaration of mgag200_mmap() from header file MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Commit 94668ac796a5 ("drm/mgag200: Convert mgag200 driver to VRAM MM") removed the implementation of mgag200_mmap(). Also remove the declaration. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg Fixes: 94668ac796a5 ("drm/mgag200: Convert mgag200 driver to VRAM MM") Cc: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Dave Airlie Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Daniel Vetter Cc: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: "Noralf Trønnes" Cc: Armijn Hemel Cc: Alex Deucher Cc: Emil Velikov Cc: # v5.3+ Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200605135803.19811-2-tzimmermann@suse.de diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h index 47df62b1ad29..92b6679029fe 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h @@ -198,6 +198,5 @@ void mgag200_i2c_destroy(struct mga_i2c_chan *i2c); int mgag200_mm_init(struct mga_device *mdev); void mgag200_mm_fini(struct mga_device *mdev); -int mgag200_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma); #endif /* __MGAG200_DRV_H__ */