From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuri Weinstein Subject: Re: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 12:39:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1600799032.6345985.1432658357501.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <5559DE24.4010601@dachary.org> <1094270224.6326426.1432656826948.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <55649E75.20802@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx5-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.37]:59115 "EHLO mx5-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752049AbbEZQkU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2015 12:40:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55649E75.20802@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek L Loic There are infrastructure related issues as well as for example the rado= s suite needs review as many jobs failed. See for example lines with "need review" notes which I am suggesting to= be reviewed by the team leads. rados run on typica and magna (for example): http://pulpito-rdu.front.sepia.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-05-15_12:42:53-= rados-hammer-distro-basic-typica/ http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/teuthology-2015-05-11_20:22:13-rados-ham= mer-distro-basic-magna/ I think it's more efficient to review such results as it feels like amo= unt of failures is unproportionally high. =20 Thx YuriW ----- Original Message ----- =46rom: "Loic Dachary" To: "Yuri Weinstein" Cc: "Ceph Development" , "Abhishek L" Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 9:25:25 AM Subject: Re: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE Hi Yuri, If I'm not mistaken http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11660 is the last is= sue blocking v0.94.2. Is there another one I don't see ? Cheers On 26/05/2015 18:13, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Loic >=20 > This hammer release QE validation is taking unusually long time and h= as issues that has to be clarified.=20 >=20 > All test results were summarized in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11= 492 >=20 > There are several reasons contributing to slowness of this validation= , product related as well as infrastructure related, also high amount o= f tests make turn around time slower as well. >=20 > I think some suites, e.g. rados and upgrades for example will have to= be re-run after issues had been clarified/fixed. >=20 > rados, krbd, knfs, samba suite test results need reviews by the team = leads. >=20 > Thx > YuriW >=20 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" > To: "Yuri Weinstein" > Cc: "Ceph Development" , "Abhishek L" > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 5:42:12 AM > Subject: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE >=20 > Hi Yuri, >=20 > The hammer branch for v0.94.2 as found at https://github.com/ceph/cep= h/commits/hammer has been approved by Greg, Yehuda, Josh and Sam and is= ready for QE. For the record, the head is https://github.com/ceph/ceph= /commit/63832d4039889b6b704b88b86eaba4aadcfceb2e and the details of the= tests run are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492 >=20 > Note that it has two more commits compared to what you tested before: >=20 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/293affe992118ed6e04f685030b2d83a7= 94ca624 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11622 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/a43d24861089a02f3b42061e482e05016= a0021f6 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11604 >=20 > which address two blockers that you listed at http://tracker.ceph.com= /issues/11492#QE-Validation >=20 > These two new commits only have influence, directly or indirectly, on= rgw. They do not require or deserve a new run of the rados, fs or rbd = suite because none of them depend on rgw, directly or indirectly. >=20 > The other two issues listed as blockers are >=20 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11613#note-4 do not need a backport to= hammer > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11591 is a teuthology related issue th= at can be worked around and does not need to be a blocker for hammer >=20 > Cheers >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html