From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guido Winkelmann Subject: Re: RBD layering design draft Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:36:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1602699.FNKvkklAzR@pc10> References: <4FDB9FBB.9000807@inktank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from unknownsite.de ([62.48.69.106]:34363 "EHLO hartes-hannover.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932953Ab2FVOgO (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:36:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Tommi Virtanen Cc: ceph-devel Am Montag, 18. Juni 2012, 10:00:32 schrieben Sie: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Josh Durgin wrote: > > $ rbd unpreserve pool/image@snap > > Error unpreserving: child images rely on this image > > UX nit: this should also say what image it found. > > rbd: Cannot unpreserve: Still in use by pool2/image2 What if it's in use by a lot of images? Should it print them all, or should it print something like "Still in use by pool2/image2 and 50 others, use list_children to see them all"? Guido