From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: martin.fuzzey@flowbird.group, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] w1: mxc_w1: Fix timeout resolution problem leading to bus" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:11:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1604405490163203@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From c9723750a699c3bd465493ac2be8992b72ccb105 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Fuzzey <martin.fuzzey@flowbird.group>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:36:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] w1: mxc_w1: Fix timeout resolution problem leading to bus
error
On my platform (i.MX53) bus access sometimes fails with
w1_search: max_slave_count 64 reached, will continue next search.
The reason is the use of jiffies to implement a 200us timeout in
mxc_w1_ds2_touch_bit().
On some platforms the jiffies timer resolution is insufficient for this.
Fix by replacing jiffies by ktime_get().
For consistency apply the same change to the other use of jiffies in
mxc_w1_ds2_reset_bus().
Fixes: f80b2581a706 ("w1: mxc_w1: Optimize mxc_w1_ds2_touch_bit()")
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Fuzzey <martin.fuzzey@flowbird.group>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1601455030-6607-1-git-send-email-martin.fuzzey@flowbird.group
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/drivers/w1/masters/mxc_w1.c b/drivers/w1/masters/mxc_w1.c
index 1ca880e01476..090cbbf9e1e2 100644
--- a/drivers/w1/masters/mxc_w1.c
+++ b/drivers/w1/masters/mxc_w1.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
-#include <linux/jiffies.h>
+#include <linux/ktime.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
@@ -40,12 +40,12 @@ struct mxc_w1_device {
static u8 mxc_w1_ds2_reset_bus(void *data)
{
struct mxc_w1_device *dev = data;
- unsigned long timeout;
+ ktime_t timeout;
writeb(MXC_W1_CONTROL_RPP, dev->regs + MXC_W1_CONTROL);
/* Wait for reset sequence 511+512us, use 1500us for sure */
- timeout = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(1500);
+ timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), 1500);
udelay(511 + 512);
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static u8 mxc_w1_ds2_reset_bus(void *data)
/* PST bit is valid after the RPP bit is self-cleared */
if (!(ctrl & MXC_W1_CONTROL_RPP))
return !(ctrl & MXC_W1_CONTROL_PST);
- } while (time_is_after_jiffies(timeout));
+ } while (ktime_before(ktime_get(), timeout));
return 1;
}
@@ -68,12 +68,12 @@ static u8 mxc_w1_ds2_reset_bus(void *data)
static u8 mxc_w1_ds2_touch_bit(void *data, u8 bit)
{
struct mxc_w1_device *dev = data;
- unsigned long timeout;
+ ktime_t timeout;
writeb(MXC_W1_CONTROL_WR(bit), dev->regs + MXC_W1_CONTROL);
/* Wait for read/write bit (60us, Max 120us), use 200us for sure */
- timeout = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(200);
+ timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), 200);
udelay(60);
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static u8 mxc_w1_ds2_touch_bit(void *data, u8 bit)
/* RDST bit is valid after the WR1/RD bit is self-cleared */
if (!(ctrl & MXC_W1_CONTROL_WR(bit)))
return !!(ctrl & MXC_W1_CONTROL_RDST);
- } while (time_is_after_jiffies(timeout));
+ } while (ktime_before(ktime_get(), timeout));
return 0;
}
next reply other threads:[~2020-11-03 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-03 12:11 gregkh [this message]
2020-11-03 12:25 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] w1: mxc_w1: Fix timeout resolution problem leading to bus" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1604405490163203@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=martin.fuzzey@flowbird.group \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.