From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Add regulator entries to Exynos5420 SMDK board Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 22:10:07 +0100 Message-ID: <1604811.B6Si6qrpKm@flatron> References: <1386236664-27763-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org> <6615089.743e1d93MS@amdc1227> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:61941 "EHLO mail-ee0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751383Ab3LTVKJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:10:09 -0500 Received: by mail-ee0-f50.google.com with SMTP id c41so1273955eek.37 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:10:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Sachin Kamat Cc: Tomasz Figa , linux-samsung-soc , Kukjin Kim On Thursday 19 of December 2013 10:05:52 Sachin Kamat wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > On 18 December 2013 20:46, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > Hi Sachin, > > > > On Thursday 05 of December 2013 15:14:24 Sachin Kamat wrote: > >> Added regulator entries to Exynos5420 SMDK board. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat > >> --- > >> Changes since v1: > >> Changed node name > >> --- > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts | 216 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 216 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts > >> index fb5a1e25c632..62e1ebe4e989 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts > >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-smdk5420.dts > >> @@ -120,4 +120,220 @@ > >> reg = <0x50>; > >> }; > >> }; > >> + > >> + hsi2c_4: i2c@12CA0000 { > >> + status = "okay"; > >> + > >> + s2mps11_pmic@66 { > > > > Just pmic@66 is enough. > > Please see my comment below. > > > > >> + compatible = "samsung,s2mps11-pmic"; > >> + reg = <0x66>; > >> + s2mps11,buck2-ramp-delay = <12>; > >> + s2mps11,buck34-ramp-delay = <12>; > >> + s2mps11,buck16-ramp-delay = <12>; > >> + s2mps11,buck6-ramp-enable = <1>; > >> + s2mps11,buck2-ramp-enable = <1>; > >> + s2mps11,buck3-ramp-enable = <1>; > >> + s2mps11,buck4-ramp-enable = <1>; > >> + > >> + s2mps11_osc: clocks { > >> + #clock-cells = <1>; > >> + clock-output-names = "s2mps11_ap", > >> + "s2mps11_cp", "s2mps11_bt"; > >> + }; > >> + > >> + regulators { > >> + ldo1_reg: LDO1 { > >> + regulator-name = "vdd_ldo1"; > > > > Is this the name as written on the PCB or board schematics? > > + the same for all regulators below. > > Yes, the schematic refers to these just as above (with no specific names). > Unless you have strong objections or a re-spin of this patch becomes > necessary, I > wouldn't want to change the name you pointed above. :) OK. Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa Best regards, Tomasz