From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFE8C433DB for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1116B2332A for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726014AbgLWO7C (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2020 09:59:02 -0500 Received: from wforward1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.30]:57689 "EHLO wforward1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725536AbgLWO7C (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2020 09:59:02 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailforward.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5CB1E4C; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 09:58:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 23 Dec 2020 09:58:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Tp6Khc fln+kYYY8kxicnODL8jwmB5hVEqcBpqiV+N/0=; b=een3NV8if0jVoafOblHYQd vnUfVrcwSQraSY5hwQ9ApxyQ2sDXFpP0feecE6x5iPuCyuVV94tW05Qb5GwGnEND n1yNuUQGy5pmIgS8x6VCbysDl+OIinwUEK9o7cPMA/rGbX2hGtoIhVQUIWUIo9Q5 VG4hVT3Tt+n7F2bqRhAJnX5aLZJeknq/ek03RIbHsgBBx4UgHAOQJNceAstOivF2 SR7aBfu8iuHN53kj5X77QmcpCgwDcaeY3rwhD2peq0vJpwMvMb7QEnv0qvdefvW3 6u29kMe65VOP9ZS4rpUnTiDEGb56Ff0ODz8+BJrC2bz6INjJMt5yuWimxQRtwApg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvddtjedgjeduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvffhfffkgggtgfesthekredttd dtlfenucfhrhhomhepoehgrhgvghhkhheslhhinhhugihfohhunhgurghtihhonhdrohhr gheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepleelledvgeefleeltdetgedugeffgffhudffudduke egfeelgeeigeekjefhleevnecuffhomhgrihhnpehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghenucfkphep keefrdekiedrjeegrdeigeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmh grihhlfhhrohhmpehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8928C1080057; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 09:58:15 -0500 (EST) Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] nl80211: validate key indexes for cfg80211_registered_device" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree To: anant.thazhemadam@gmail.com, johannes.berg@intel.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net Cc: From: Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:59:19 +0100 Message-ID: <1608735559179151@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to . thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 2d9463083ce92636a1bdd3e30d1236e3e95d859e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anant Thazhemadam Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 03:28:25 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] nl80211: validate key indexes for cfg80211_registered_device syzbot discovered a bug in which an OOB access was being made because an unsuitable key_idx value was wrongly considered to be acceptable while deleting a key in nl80211_del_key(). Since we don't know the cipher at the time of deletion, if cfg80211_validate_key_settings() were to be called directly in nl80211_del_key(), even valid keys would be wrongly determined invalid, and deletion wouldn't occur correctly. For this reason, a new function - cfg80211_valid_key_idx(), has been created, to determine if the key_idx value provided is valid or not. cfg80211_valid_key_idx() is directly called in 2 places - nl80211_del_key(), and cfg80211_validate_key_settings(). Reported-by: syzbot+49d4cab497c2142ee170@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+49d4cab497c2142ee170@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Suggested-by: Johannes Berg Signed-off-by: Anant Thazhemadam Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201204215825.129879-1-anant.thazhemadam@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [also disallow IGTK key IDs if no IGTK cipher is supported] Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg diff --git a/net/wireless/core.h b/net/wireless/core.h index e3e9686859d4..7df91f940212 100644 --- a/net/wireless/core.h +++ b/net/wireless/core.h @@ -433,6 +433,8 @@ void cfg80211_sme_abandon_assoc(struct wireless_dev *wdev); /* internal helpers */ bool cfg80211_supported_cipher_suite(struct wiphy *wiphy, u32 cipher); +bool cfg80211_valid_key_idx(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, + int key_idx, bool pairwise); int cfg80211_validate_key_settings(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, struct key_params *params, int key_idx, bool pairwise, const u8 *mac_addr); diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c index c8d31181a660..910872974f2d 100644 --- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c +++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c @@ -4239,9 +4239,6 @@ static int nl80211_del_key(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) if (err) return err; - if (key.idx < 0) - return -EINVAL; - if (info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_MAC]) mac_addr = nla_data(info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_MAC]); @@ -4257,6 +4254,10 @@ static int nl80211_del_key(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info) key.type != NL80211_KEYTYPE_GROUP) return -EINVAL; + if (!cfg80211_valid_key_idx(rdev, key.idx, + key.type == NL80211_KEYTYPE_PAIRWISE)) + return -EINVAL; + if (!rdev->ops->del_key) return -EOPNOTSUPP; diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c index 79c5780e3033..b4acc805114b 100644 --- a/net/wireless/util.c +++ b/net/wireless/util.c @@ -272,18 +272,53 @@ bool cfg80211_supported_cipher_suite(struct wiphy *wiphy, u32 cipher) return false; } -int cfg80211_validate_key_settings(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, - struct key_params *params, int key_idx, - bool pairwise, const u8 *mac_addr) +static bool +cfg80211_igtk_cipher_supported(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev) { - int max_key_idx = 5; + struct wiphy *wiphy = &rdev->wiphy; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < wiphy->n_cipher_suites; i++) { + switch (wiphy->cipher_suites[i]) { + case WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_AES_CMAC: + case WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_BIP_CMAC_256: + case WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_BIP_GMAC_128: + case WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_BIP_GMAC_256: + return true; + } + } + + return false; +} - if (wiphy_ext_feature_isset(&rdev->wiphy, - NL80211_EXT_FEATURE_BEACON_PROTECTION) || - wiphy_ext_feature_isset(&rdev->wiphy, - NL80211_EXT_FEATURE_BEACON_PROTECTION_CLIENT)) +bool cfg80211_valid_key_idx(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, + int key_idx, bool pairwise) +{ + int max_key_idx; + + if (pairwise) + max_key_idx = 3; + else if (wiphy_ext_feature_isset(&rdev->wiphy, + NL80211_EXT_FEATURE_BEACON_PROTECTION) || + wiphy_ext_feature_isset(&rdev->wiphy, + NL80211_EXT_FEATURE_BEACON_PROTECTION_CLIENT)) max_key_idx = 7; + else if (cfg80211_igtk_cipher_supported(rdev)) + max_key_idx = 5; + else + max_key_idx = 3; + if (key_idx < 0 || key_idx > max_key_idx) + return false; + + return true; +} + +int cfg80211_validate_key_settings(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev, + struct key_params *params, int key_idx, + bool pairwise, const u8 *mac_addr) +{ + if (!cfg80211_valid_key_idx(rdev, key_idx, pairwise)) return -EINVAL; if (!pairwise && mac_addr && !(rdev->wiphy.flags & WIPHY_FLAG_IBSS_RSN))