From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: sallenki@codeaurora.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
peter.chen@nxp.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: patch "usb: gadget: Fix spinlock lockup on usb_function_deactivate" added to usb-linus
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 15:46:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <160916676346169@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
usb: gadget: Fix spinlock lockup on usb_function_deactivate
to my usb git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git
in the usb-linus branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
From 5cc35c224a80aa5a5a539510ef049faf0d6ed181 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sriharsha Allenki <sallenki@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:32:20 +0530
Subject: usb: gadget: Fix spinlock lockup on usb_function_deactivate
There is a spinlock lockup as part of composite_disconnect
when it tries to acquire cdev->lock as part of usb_gadget_deactivate.
This is because the usb_gadget_deactivate is called from
usb_function_deactivate with the same spinlock held.
This would result in the below call stack and leads to stall.
rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
rcu: 3-...0: (1 GPs behind) idle=162/1/0x4000000000000000
softirq=10819/10819 fqs=2356
(detected by 2, t=5252 jiffies, g=20129, q=3770)
Task dump for CPU 3:
task:uvc-gadget_wlhe state:R running task stack: 0 pid: 674 ppid:
636 flags:0x00000202
Call trace:
__switch_to+0xc0/0x170
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x84/0xb0
composite_disconnect+0x28/0x78
configfs_composite_disconnect+0x68/0x70
usb_gadget_disconnect+0x10c/0x128
usb_gadget_deactivate+0xd4/0x108
usb_function_deactivate+0x6c/0x80
uvc_function_disconnect+0x20/0x58
uvc_v4l2_release+0x30/0x88
v4l2_release+0xbc/0xf0
__fput+0x7c/0x230
____fput+0x14/0x20
task_work_run+0x88/0x140
do_notify_resume+0x240/0x6f0
work_pending+0x8/0x200
Fix this by doing an unlock on cdev->lock before the usb_gadget_deactivate
call from usb_function_deactivate.
The same lockup can happen in the usb_gadget_activate path. Fix that path
as well.
Reported-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20201102094936.GA29581@b29397-desktop/
Tested-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sriharsha Allenki <sallenki@codeaurora.org>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201202130220.24926-1-sallenki@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
index c6d455f2bb92..1a556a628971 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
@@ -392,8 +392,11 @@ int usb_function_deactivate(struct usb_function *function)
spin_lock_irqsave(&cdev->lock, flags);
- if (cdev->deactivations == 0)
+ if (cdev->deactivations == 0) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cdev->lock, flags);
status = usb_gadget_deactivate(cdev->gadget);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&cdev->lock, flags);
+ }
if (status == 0)
cdev->deactivations++;
@@ -424,8 +427,11 @@ int usb_function_activate(struct usb_function *function)
status = -EINVAL;
else {
cdev->deactivations--;
- if (cdev->deactivations == 0)
+ if (cdev->deactivations == 0) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cdev->lock, flags);
status = usb_gadget_activate(cdev->gadget);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&cdev->lock, flags);
+ }
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cdev->lock, flags);
--
2.29.2
reply other threads:[~2020-12-28 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=160916676346169@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=peter.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=sallenki@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.