From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ayal@nvidia.com, kuba@kernel.org, tariqt@nvidia.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: ipv6: Validate GSO SKB before finish IPv6 processing" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 14:26:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1611321969160123@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From b210de4f8c97d57de051e805686248ec4c6cfc52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aya Levin <ayal@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 15:50:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] net: ipv6: Validate GSO SKB before finish IPv6 processing
There are cases where GSO segment's length exceeds the egress MTU:
- Forwarding of a TCP GRO skb, when DF flag is not set.
- Forwarding of an skb that arrived on a virtualisation interface
(virtio-net/vhost/tap) with TSO/GSO size set by other network
stack.
- Local GSO skb transmitted on an NETIF_F_TSO tunnel stacked over an
interface with a smaller MTU.
- Arriving GRO skb (or GSO skb in a virtualised environment) that is
bridged to a NETIF_F_TSO tunnel stacked over an interface with an
insufficient MTU.
If so:
- Consume the SKB and its segments.
- Issue an ICMP packet with 'Packet Too Big' message containing the
MTU, allowing the source host to reduce its Path MTU appropriately.
Note: These cases are handled in the same manner in IPv4 output finish.
This patch aligns the behavior of IPv6 and the one of IPv4.
Fixes: 9e50849054a4 ("netfilter: ipv6: move POSTROUTING invocation before fragmentation")
Signed-off-by: Aya Levin <ayal@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1610027418-30438-1-git-send-email-ayal@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
index 749ad72386b2..077d43af8226 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
@@ -125,8 +125,43 @@ static int ip6_finish_output2(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *
return -EINVAL;
}
+static int
+ip6_finish_output_gso_slowpath_drop(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
+ struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int mtu)
+{
+ struct sk_buff *segs, *nskb;
+ netdev_features_t features;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ /* Please see corresponding comment in ip_finish_output_gso
+ * describing the cases where GSO segment length exceeds the
+ * egress MTU.
+ */
+ features = netif_skb_features(skb);
+ segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, features & ~NETIF_F_GSO_MASK);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(segs)) {
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ consume_skb(skb);
+
+ skb_list_walk_safe(segs, segs, nskb) {
+ int err;
+
+ skb_mark_not_on_list(segs);
+ err = ip6_fragment(net, sk, segs, ip6_finish_output2);
+ if (err && ret == 0)
+ ret = err;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int __ip6_finish_output(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
+ unsigned int mtu;
+
#if defined(CONFIG_NETFILTER) && defined(CONFIG_XFRM)
/* Policy lookup after SNAT yielded a new policy */
if (skb_dst(skb)->xfrm) {
@@ -135,7 +170,11 @@ static int __ip6_finish_output(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
}
#endif
- if ((skb->len > ip6_skb_dst_mtu(skb) && !skb_is_gso(skb)) ||
+ mtu = ip6_skb_dst_mtu(skb);
+ if (skb_is_gso(skb) && !skb_gso_validate_network_len(skb, mtu))
+ return ip6_finish_output_gso_slowpath_drop(net, sk, skb, mtu);
+
+ if ((skb->len > mtu && !skb_is_gso(skb)) ||
dst_allfrag(skb_dst(skb)) ||
(IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size && skb->len > IP6CB(skb)->frag_max_size))
return ip6_fragment(net, sk, skb, ip6_finish_output2);
reply other threads:[~2021-01-22 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1611321969160123@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ayal@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.