All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: asml.silence@gmail.com, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: fix cancellation taking mutex while" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 13:54:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <161218405715580@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From ca70f00bed6cb255b7a9b91aa18a2717c9217f70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:28:27 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: fix cancellation taking mutex while
 TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE

do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=2 set at
	[<00000000ced9dbfc>] prepare_to_wait+0x1f4/0x3b0
	kernel/sched/wait.c:262
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 19888 at kernel/sched/core.c:7853
	__might_sleep+0xed/0x100 kernel/sched/core.c:7848
RIP: 0010:__might_sleep+0xed/0x100 kernel/sched/core.c:7848
Call Trace:
 __mutex_lock_common+0xc4/0x2ef0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:935
 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 [inline]
 mutex_lock_nested+0x1a/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1118
 io_wq_submit_work+0x39a/0x720 fs/io_uring.c:6411
 io_run_cancel fs/io-wq.c:856 [inline]
 io_wqe_cancel_pending_work fs/io-wq.c:990 [inline]
 io_wq_cancel_cb+0x614/0xcb0 fs/io-wq.c:1027
 io_uring_cancel_files fs/io_uring.c:8874 [inline]
 io_uring_cancel_task_requests fs/io_uring.c:8952 [inline]
 __io_uring_files_cancel+0x115d/0x19e0 fs/io_uring.c:9038
 io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:51 [inline]
 do_exit+0x2e6/0x2490 kernel/exit.c:780
 do_group_exit+0x168/0x2d0 kernel/exit.c:922
 get_signal+0x16b5/0x2030 kernel/signal.c:2770
 arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x8e/0x6a0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:811
 handle_signal_work kernel/entry/common.c:147 [inline]
 exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:171 [inline]
 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xac/0x1e0 kernel/entry/common.c:201
 __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:291 [inline]
 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x48/0x190 kernel/entry/common.c:302
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Rewrite io_uring_cancel_files() to mimic __io_uring_task_cancel()'s
counting scheme, so it does all the heavy work before setting
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.9+
Reported-by: syzbot+f655445043a26a7cfab8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
[axboe: fix inverted task check]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 09aada153a71..bb0270eeb8cb 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -8873,30 +8873,31 @@ static void io_cancel_defer_files(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 	}
 }
 
+static int io_uring_count_inflight(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+				   struct task_struct *task,
+				   struct files_struct *files)
+{
+	struct io_kiocb *req;
+	int cnt = 0;
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&ctx->inflight_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(req, &ctx->inflight_list, inflight_entry)
+		cnt += io_match_task(req, task, files);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->inflight_lock);
+	return cnt;
+}
+
 static void io_uring_cancel_files(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 				  struct task_struct *task,
 				  struct files_struct *files)
 {
 	while (!list_empty_careful(&ctx->inflight_list)) {
 		struct io_task_cancel cancel = { .task = task, .files = files };
-		struct io_kiocb *req;
 		DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
-		bool found = false;
-
-		spin_lock_irq(&ctx->inflight_lock);
-		list_for_each_entry(req, &ctx->inflight_list, inflight_entry) {
-			if (!io_match_task(req, task, files))
-				continue;
-			found = true;
-			break;
-		}
-		if (found)
-			prepare_to_wait(&task->io_uring->wait, &wait,
-					TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-		spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->inflight_lock);
+		int inflight;
 
-		/* We need to keep going until we don't find a matching req */
-		if (!found)
+		inflight = io_uring_count_inflight(ctx, task, files);
+		if (!inflight)
 			break;
 
 		io_wq_cancel_cb(ctx->io_wq, io_cancel_task_cb, &cancel, true);
@@ -8905,7 +8906,11 @@ static void io_uring_cancel_files(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 		io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, true, task, files);
 		/* cancellations _may_ trigger task work */
 		io_run_task_work();
-		schedule();
+
+		prepare_to_wait(&task->io_uring->wait, &wait,
+				TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+		if (inflight == io_uring_count_inflight(ctx, task, files))
+			schedule();
 		finish_wait(&task->io_uring->wait, &wait);
 	}
 }


                 reply	other threads:[~2021-02-01 12:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=161218405715580@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.