From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: asml.silence@gmail.com, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring: fix cancellation taking mutex while" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 13:54:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <161218405715580@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From ca70f00bed6cb255b7a9b91aa18a2717c9217f70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:28:27 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: fix cancellation taking mutex while
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=2 set at
[<00000000ced9dbfc>] prepare_to_wait+0x1f4/0x3b0
kernel/sched/wait.c:262
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 19888 at kernel/sched/core.c:7853
__might_sleep+0xed/0x100 kernel/sched/core.c:7848
RIP: 0010:__might_sleep+0xed/0x100 kernel/sched/core.c:7848
Call Trace:
__mutex_lock_common+0xc4/0x2ef0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:935
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x1a/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1118
io_wq_submit_work+0x39a/0x720 fs/io_uring.c:6411
io_run_cancel fs/io-wq.c:856 [inline]
io_wqe_cancel_pending_work fs/io-wq.c:990 [inline]
io_wq_cancel_cb+0x614/0xcb0 fs/io-wq.c:1027
io_uring_cancel_files fs/io_uring.c:8874 [inline]
io_uring_cancel_task_requests fs/io_uring.c:8952 [inline]
__io_uring_files_cancel+0x115d/0x19e0 fs/io_uring.c:9038
io_uring_files_cancel include/linux/io_uring.h:51 [inline]
do_exit+0x2e6/0x2490 kernel/exit.c:780
do_group_exit+0x168/0x2d0 kernel/exit.c:922
get_signal+0x16b5/0x2030 kernel/signal.c:2770
arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x8e/0x6a0 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:811
handle_signal_work kernel/entry/common.c:147 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:171 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xac/0x1e0 kernel/entry/common.c:201
__syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:291 [inline]
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x48/0x190 kernel/entry/common.c:302
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Rewrite io_uring_cancel_files() to mimic __io_uring_task_cancel()'s
counting scheme, so it does all the heavy work before setting
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.9+
Reported-by: syzbot+f655445043a26a7cfab8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
[axboe: fix inverted task check]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 09aada153a71..bb0270eeb8cb 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -8873,30 +8873,31 @@ static void io_cancel_defer_files(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
}
}
+static int io_uring_count_inflight(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
+ struct task_struct *task,
+ struct files_struct *files)
+{
+ struct io_kiocb *req;
+ int cnt = 0;
+
+ spin_lock_irq(&ctx->inflight_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(req, &ctx->inflight_list, inflight_entry)
+ cnt += io_match_task(req, task, files);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->inflight_lock);
+ return cnt;
+}
+
static void io_uring_cancel_files(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
struct task_struct *task,
struct files_struct *files)
{
while (!list_empty_careful(&ctx->inflight_list)) {
struct io_task_cancel cancel = { .task = task, .files = files };
- struct io_kiocb *req;
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
- bool found = false;
-
- spin_lock_irq(&ctx->inflight_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(req, &ctx->inflight_list, inflight_entry) {
- if (!io_match_task(req, task, files))
- continue;
- found = true;
- break;
- }
- if (found)
- prepare_to_wait(&task->io_uring->wait, &wait,
- TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
- spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->inflight_lock);
+ int inflight;
- /* We need to keep going until we don't find a matching req */
- if (!found)
+ inflight = io_uring_count_inflight(ctx, task, files);
+ if (!inflight)
break;
io_wq_cancel_cb(ctx->io_wq, io_cancel_task_cb, &cancel, true);
@@ -8905,7 +8906,11 @@ static void io_uring_cancel_files(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
io_cqring_overflow_flush(ctx, true, task, files);
/* cancellations _may_ trigger task work */
io_run_task_work();
- schedule();
+
+ prepare_to_wait(&task->io_uring->wait, &wait,
+ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ if (inflight == io_uring_count_inflight(ctx, task, files))
+ schedule();
finish_wait(&task->io_uring->wait, &wait);
}
}
reply other threads:[~2021-02-01 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=161218405715580@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.