From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: matt.chen@intel.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org, luciano.coelho@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] iwlwifi: mvm: fix the return type for DSM functions 1 and 2" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:57:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1612450640220130@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From aefbe5c445c7e2f0e082b086ba1e45502dac4b0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matt Chen <matt.chen@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 14:52:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] iwlwifi: mvm: fix the return type for DSM functions 1 and 2
The return type value of functions 1 and 2 were considered to be an
integer inside a buffer, but they can also be only an integer, without
the buffer. Fix the code in iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8() to handle it as a
single integer value, as well as packed inside a buffer.
Signed-off-by: Matt Chen <matt.chen@intel.com>
Fixes: 9db93491f29e ("iwlwifi: acpi: support device specific method (DSM)")
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210122144849.5757092adcd6.Ic24524627b899c9a01af38107a62a626bdf5ae3a@changeid
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c
index 15248b064380..d8b7776a8dde 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c
@@ -80,19 +80,45 @@ static void *iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object(struct device *dev, int rev, int func,
}
/*
- * Evaluate a DSM with no arguments and a single u8 return value (inside a
- * buffer object), verify and return that value.
+ * Generic function to evaluate a DSM with no arguments
+ * and an integer return value,
+ * (as an integer object or inside a buffer object),
+ * verify and assign the value in the "value" parameter.
+ * return 0 in success and the appropriate errno otherwise.
*/
-int iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8(struct device *dev, int rev, int func)
+static int iwl_acpi_get_dsm_integer(struct device *dev, int rev, int func,
+ u64 *value, size_t expected_size)
{
union acpi_object *obj;
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
obj = iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object(dev, rev, func, NULL);
- if (IS_ERR(obj))
+ if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
+ IWL_DEBUG_DEV_RADIO(dev,
+ "Failed to get DSM object. func= %d\n",
+ func);
return -ENOENT;
+ }
+
+ if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
+ *value = obj->integer.value;
+ } else if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
+ __le64 le_value = 0;
- if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(expected_size > sizeof(le_value)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* if the buffer size doesn't match the expected size */
+ if (obj->buffer.length != expected_size)
+ IWL_DEBUG_DEV_RADIO(dev,
+ "ACPI: DSM invalid buffer size, padding or truncating (%d)\n",
+ obj->buffer.length);
+
+ /* assuming LE from Intel BIOS spec */
+ memcpy(&le_value, obj->buffer.pointer,
+ min_t(size_t, expected_size, (size_t)obj->buffer.length));
+ *value = le64_to_cpu(le_value);
+ } else {
IWL_DEBUG_DEV_RADIO(dev,
"ACPI: DSM method did not return a valid object, type=%d\n",
obj->type);
@@ -100,15 +126,6 @@ int iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8(struct device *dev, int rev, int func)
goto out;
}
- if (obj->buffer.length != sizeof(u8)) {
- IWL_DEBUG_DEV_RADIO(dev,
- "ACPI: DSM method returned invalid buffer, length=%d\n",
- obj->buffer.length);
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
- }
-
- ret = obj->buffer.pointer[0];
IWL_DEBUG_DEV_RADIO(dev,
"ACPI: DSM method evaluated: func=%d, ret=%d\n",
func, ret);
@@ -116,6 +133,24 @@ int iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8(struct device *dev, int rev, int func)
ACPI_FREE(obj);
return ret;
}
+
+/*
+ * Evaluate a DSM with no arguments and a u8 return value,
+ */
+int iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8(struct device *dev, int rev, int func, u8 *value)
+{
+ int ret;
+ u64 val;
+
+ ret = iwl_acpi_get_dsm_integer(dev, rev, func, &val, sizeof(u8));
+
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* cast val (u64) to be u8 */
+ *value = (u8)val;
+ return 0;
+}
IWL_EXPORT_SYMBOL(iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8);
union acpi_object *iwl_acpi_get_wifi_pkg(struct device *dev,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.h b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.h
index 042dd247d387..1cce30d1ef55 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.h
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause */
/*
* Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Deutschland GmbH
- * Copyright (C) 2018-2020 Intel Corporation
+ * Copyright (C) 2018-2021 Intel Corporation
*/
#ifndef __iwl_fw_acpi__
#define __iwl_fw_acpi__
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ struct iwl_fw_runtime;
void *iwl_acpi_get_object(struct device *dev, acpi_string method);
-int iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8(struct device *dev, int rev, int func);
+int iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8(struct device *dev, int rev, int func, u8 *value);
union acpi_object *iwl_acpi_get_wifi_pkg(struct device *dev,
union acpi_object *data,
@@ -159,7 +159,8 @@ static inline void *iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object(struct device *dev, int rev,
return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
}
-static inline int iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8(struct device *dev, int rev, int func)
+static inline
+int iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8(struct device *dev, int rev, int func, u8 *value)
{
return -ENOENT;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/fw.c
index 0637eb1cff4e..313e9f106f46 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/fw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/fw.c
@@ -1090,20 +1090,22 @@ static void iwl_mvm_tas_init(struct iwl_mvm *mvm)
static u8 iwl_mvm_eval_dsm_indonesia_5g2(struct iwl_mvm *mvm)
{
+ u8 value;
+
int ret = iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8((&mvm->fwrt)->dev, 0,
- DSM_FUNC_ENABLE_INDONESIA_5G2);
+ DSM_FUNC_ENABLE_INDONESIA_5G2, &value);
if (ret < 0)
IWL_DEBUG_RADIO(mvm,
"Failed to evaluate DSM function ENABLE_INDONESIA_5G2, ret=%d\n",
ret);
- else if (ret >= DSM_VALUE_INDONESIA_MAX)
+ else if (value >= DSM_VALUE_INDONESIA_MAX)
IWL_DEBUG_RADIO(mvm,
- "DSM function ENABLE_INDONESIA_5G2 return invalid value, ret=%d\n",
- ret);
+ "DSM function ENABLE_INDONESIA_5G2 return invalid value, value=%d\n",
+ value);
- else if (ret == DSM_VALUE_INDONESIA_ENABLE) {
+ else if (value == DSM_VALUE_INDONESIA_ENABLE) {
IWL_DEBUG_RADIO(mvm,
"Evaluated DSM function ENABLE_INDONESIA_5G2: Enabling 5g2\n");
return DSM_VALUE_INDONESIA_ENABLE;
@@ -1114,25 +1116,26 @@ static u8 iwl_mvm_eval_dsm_indonesia_5g2(struct iwl_mvm *mvm)
static u8 iwl_mvm_eval_dsm_disable_srd(struct iwl_mvm *mvm)
{
+ u8 value;
int ret = iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8((&mvm->fwrt)->dev, 0,
- DSM_FUNC_DISABLE_SRD);
+ DSM_FUNC_DISABLE_SRD, &value);
if (ret < 0)
IWL_DEBUG_RADIO(mvm,
"Failed to evaluate DSM function DISABLE_SRD, ret=%d\n",
ret);
- else if (ret >= DSM_VALUE_SRD_MAX)
+ else if (value >= DSM_VALUE_SRD_MAX)
IWL_DEBUG_RADIO(mvm,
- "DSM function DISABLE_SRD return invalid value, ret=%d\n",
- ret);
+ "DSM function DISABLE_SRD return invalid value, value=%d\n",
+ value);
- else if (ret == DSM_VALUE_SRD_PASSIVE) {
+ else if (value == DSM_VALUE_SRD_PASSIVE) {
IWL_DEBUG_RADIO(mvm,
"Evaluated DSM function DISABLE_SRD: setting SRD to passive\n");
return DSM_VALUE_SRD_PASSIVE;
- } else if (ret == DSM_VALUE_SRD_DISABLE) {
+ } else if (value == DSM_VALUE_SRD_DISABLE) {
IWL_DEBUG_RADIO(mvm,
"Evaluated DSM function DISABLE_SRD: disabling SRD\n");
return DSM_VALUE_SRD_DISABLE;
reply other threads:[~2021-02-04 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1612450640220130@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
--cc=matt.chen@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.