From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, kpsingh@chromium.org, revest@google.com,
jackmanb@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kpsingh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/5] bpf: Be less specific about socket cookies guarantees
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 02:20:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <161309640759.12988.9852007346010349044.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210210111406.785541-1-revest@chromium.org>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:14:02 +0100 you wrote:
> Since "92acdc58ab11 bpf, net: Rework cookie generator as per-cpu one"
> socket cookies are not guaranteed to be non-decreasing. The
> bpf_get_socket_cookie helper descriptions are currently specifying that
> cookies are non-decreasing but we don't want users to rely on that.
>
> Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
> Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v7,1/5] bpf: Be less specific about socket cookies guarantees
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/07881ccbf40c
- [bpf-next,v7,2/5] bpf: Expose bpf_get_socket_cookie to tracing programs
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c5dbb89fc2ac
- [bpf-next,v7,3/5] selftests/bpf: Integrate the socket_cookie test to test_progs
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/61f8c9c8f3c8
- [bpf-next,v7,4/5] selftests/bpf: Use vmlinux.h in socket_cookie_prog.c
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6cd4dcc3fb81
- [bpf-next,v7,5/5] selftests/bpf: Add a selftest for the tracing bpf_get_socket_cookie
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6fdd671baaf5
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-12 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-10 11:14 [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/5] bpf: Be less specific about socket cookies guarantees Florent Revest
2021-02-10 11:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/5] bpf: Expose bpf_get_socket_cookie to tracing programs Florent Revest
2021-02-10 19:51 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-10 19:55 ` Florent Revest
2021-02-12 2:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-02-10 11:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/5] selftests/bpf: Integrate the socket_cookie test to test_progs Florent Revest
2021-02-10 11:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/5] selftests/bpf: Use vmlinux.h in socket_cookie_prog.c Florent Revest
2021-02-10 11:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add a selftest for the tracing bpf_get_socket_cookie Florent Revest
2021-02-12 2:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=161309640759.12988.9852007346010349044.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jackmanb@chromium.org \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=revest@chromium.org \
--cc=revest@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.