From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Define guc firmware blob for older Cometlakes" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 15:05:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <161460753820437@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 70960ab27542d8dc322f909f516391f331fbd3f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 12:08:28 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Define guc firmware blob for older Cometlakes
When splitting the Coffeelake define to also identify Cometlakes, I
missed the double fw_def for Coffeelake. That is only newer Cometlakes
use the cml specific guc firmware, older Cometlakes should use kbl
firmware.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2859
Fixes: 5f4ae2704d59 ("drm/i915: Identify Cometlake platform")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.9+
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201229120828.29931-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
index 180c23e2e25e..602f1a0bc587 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ void intel_uc_fw_change_status(struct intel_uc_fw *uc_fw,
fw_def(ELKHARTLAKE, 0, guc_def(ehl, 49, 0, 1), huc_def(ehl, 9, 0, 0)) \
fw_def(ICELAKE, 0, guc_def(icl, 49, 0, 1), huc_def(icl, 9, 0, 0)) \
fw_def(COMETLAKE, 5, guc_def(cml, 49, 0, 1), huc_def(cml, 4, 0, 0)) \
+ fw_def(COMETLAKE, 0, guc_def(kbl, 49, 0, 1), huc_def(kbl, 4, 0, 0)) \
fw_def(COFFEELAKE, 0, guc_def(kbl, 49, 0, 1), huc_def(kbl, 4, 0, 0)) \
fw_def(GEMINILAKE, 0, guc_def(glk, 49, 0, 1), huc_def(glk, 4, 0, 0)) \
fw_def(KABYLAKE, 0, guc_def(kbl, 49, 0, 1), huc_def(kbl, 4, 0, 0)) \
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-01 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-01 14:05 gregkh [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-11 9:00 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Define guc firmware blob for older Cometlakes" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=161460753820437@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.