All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: acme@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tmricht@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
	sumanthk@linux.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] perf test: Support the ins_lat check in the X86 specific test
Date: Wed,  3 Mar 2021 08:01:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1614787285-104151-2-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1614787285-104151-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

The ins_lat of PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT stands for the instruction
latency, which is only available for X86. Add a X86 specific test for
the ins_lat and PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT type.

The test__x86_sample_parsing() uses the same way as the
test__sample_parsing() to verify a sample type. Since the ins_lat and
PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT are the only X86 specific sample type for now,
the test__x86_sample_parsing() only verify the PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT
type. Other sample types are still verified in the generic test.

$perf test 77 -v
77: x86 Sample parsing                                              :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 102370
test child finished with 0
---- end ----
x86 Sample parsing: Ok

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h   |   1 +
 tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/Build            |   1 +
 tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/arch-tests.c     |   4 +
 tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 127 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c

diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h b/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h
index 6a54b94..0e20f3d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/include/arch-tests.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ int test__rdpmc(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest);
 int test__insn_x86(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest);
 int test__intel_pt_pkt_decoder(struct test *test, int subtest);
 int test__bp_modify(struct test *test, int subtest);
+int test__x86_sample_parsing(struct test *test, int subtest);
 
 #ifdef HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT
 struct thread;
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/Build b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/Build
index 36d4f24..28d7933 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/Build
@@ -3,5 +3,6 @@ perf-$(CONFIG_DWARF_UNWIND) += dwarf-unwind.o
 
 perf-y += arch-tests.o
 perf-y += rdpmc.o
+perf-y += sample-parsing.o
 perf-$(CONFIG_AUXTRACE) += insn-x86.o intel-pt-pkt-decoder-test.o
 perf-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += bp-modify.o
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/arch-tests.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/arch-tests.c
index bc25d72..71aa673 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/arch-tests.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/arch-tests.c
@@ -31,6 +31,10 @@ struct test arch_tests[] = {
 	},
 #endif
 	{
+		.desc = "x86 Sample parsing",
+		.func = test__x86_sample_parsing,
+	},
+	{
 		.func = NULL,
 	},
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c92db87
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/sample-parsing.c
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <inttypes.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+#include "event.h"
+#include "evsel.h"
+#include "debug.h"
+#include "util/synthetic-events.h"
+
+#include "tests/tests.h"
+#include "arch-tests.h"
+
+#define COMP(m) do {					\
+	if (s1->m != s2->m) {				\
+		pr_debug("Samples differ at '"#m"'\n");	\
+		return false;				\
+	}						\
+} while (0)
+
+static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1,
+			 const struct perf_sample *s2,
+			 u64 type)
+{
+	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT)
+		COMP(ins_lat);
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static int do_test(u64 sample_type)
+{
+	struct evsel evsel = {
+		.needs_swap = false,
+		.core = {
+			. attr = {
+				.sample_type = sample_type,
+				.read_format = 0,
+			},
+		},
+	};
+	union perf_event *event;
+	struct perf_sample sample = {
+		.weight		= 101,
+		.ins_lat        = 102,
+	};
+	struct perf_sample sample_out;
+	size_t i, sz, bufsz;
+	int err, ret = -1;
+
+	sz = perf_event__sample_event_size(&sample, sample_type, 0);
+	bufsz = sz + 4096; /* Add a bit for overrun checking */
+	event = malloc(bufsz);
+	if (!event) {
+		pr_debug("malloc failed\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	memset(event, 0xff, bufsz);
+	event->header.type = PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE;
+	event->header.misc = 0;
+	event->header.size = sz;
+
+	err = perf_event__synthesize_sample(event, sample_type, 0, &sample);
+	if (err) {
+		pr_debug("%s failed for sample_type %#"PRIx64", error %d\n",
+			 "perf_event__synthesize_sample", sample_type, err);
+		goto out_free;
+	}
+
+	/* The data does not contain 0xff so we use that to check the size */
+	for (i = bufsz; i > 0; i--) {
+		if (*(i - 1 + (u8 *)event) != 0xff)
+			break;
+	}
+	if (i != sz) {
+		pr_debug("Event size mismatch: actual %zu vs expected %zu\n",
+			 i, sz);
+		goto out_free;
+	}
+
+	evsel.sample_size = __evsel__sample_size(sample_type);
+
+	err = evsel__parse_sample(&evsel, event, &sample_out);
+	if (err) {
+		pr_debug("%s failed for sample_type %#"PRIx64", error %d\n",
+			 "evsel__parse_sample", sample_type, err);
+		goto out_free;
+	}
+
+	if (!samples_same(&sample, &sample_out, sample_type)) {
+		pr_debug("parsing failed for sample_type %#"PRIx64"\n",
+			 sample_type);
+		goto out_free;
+	}
+
+	ret = 0;
+out_free:
+	free(event);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * test__x86_sample_parsing - test X86 specific sample parsing
+ *
+ * This function implements a test that synthesizes a sample event, parses it
+ * and then checks that the parsed sample matches the original sample. If the
+ * test passes %0 is returned, otherwise %-1 is returned.
+ *
+ * For now, the PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT is the only X86 specific sample type.
+ * The test only checks the PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT type.
+ */
+int test__x86_sample_parsing(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused)
+{
+	return do_test(PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT);
+}
-- 
2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-03 16:01 [PATCH 1/2] perf test: Fix sample-parsing fails on non-x86 platforms kan.liang
2021-03-03 16:01 ` kan.liang [this message]
2021-03-03 16:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1614787285-104151-2-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.