From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] powerpc/perf: Fix handling of privilege level checks in perf" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:43:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1615484611128126@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 5ae5fbd2107959b68ac69a8b75412208663aea88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 05:10:39 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/perf: Fix handling of privilege level checks in perf
interrupt context
Running "perf mem record" in powerpc platforms with selinux enabled
resulted in soft lockup's. Below call-trace was seen in the logs:
CPU: 58 PID: 3751 Comm: sssd_nss Not tainted 5.11.0-rc7+ #2
NIP: c000000000dff3d4 LR: c000000000dff3d0 CTR: 0000000000000000
REGS: c000007fffab7d60 TRAP: 0100 Not tainted (5.11.0-rc7+)
...
NIP _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x94/0x120
LR _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0x120
Call Trace:
0xc00000000fd47260 (unreliable)
skb_queue_tail+0x3c/0x90
audit_log_end+0x6c/0x180
common_lsm_audit+0xb0/0xe0
slow_avc_audit+0xa4/0x110
avc_has_perm+0x1c4/0x260
selinux_perf_event_open+0x74/0xd0
security_perf_event_open+0x68/0xc0
record_and_restart+0x6e8/0x7f0
perf_event_interrupt+0x22c/0x560
performance_monitor_exception0x4c/0x60
performance_monitor_common_virt+0x1c8/0x1d0
interrupt: f00 at _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x38/0x120
NIP: c000000000dff378 LR: c000000000b5fbbc CTR: c0000000007d47f0
REGS: c00000000fd47860 TRAP: 0f00 Not tainted (5.11.0-rc7+)
...
NIP _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x38/0x120
LR skb_queue_tail+0x3c/0x90
interrupt: f00
0x38 (unreliable)
0xc00000000aae6200
audit_log_end+0x6c/0x180
audit_log_exit+0x344/0xf80
__audit_syscall_exit+0x2c0/0x320
do_syscall_trace_leave+0x148/0x200
syscall_exit_prepare+0x324/0x390
system_call_common+0xfc/0x27c
The above trace shows that while the CPU was handling a performance
monitor exception, there was a call to security_perf_event_open()
function. In powerpc core-book3s, this function is called from
perf_allow_kernel() check during recording of data address in the
sample via perf_get_data_addr().
Commit da97e18458fb ("perf_event: Add support for LSM and SELinux
checks") introduced security enhancements to perf. As part of this
commit, the new security hook for perf_event_open() was added in all
places where perf paranoid check was previously used. In powerpc
core-book3s code, originally had paranoid checks in
perf_get_data_addr() and power_pmu_bhrb_read(). So
perf_paranoid_kernel() checks were replaced with perf_allow_kernel()
in these PMU helper functions as well.
The intention of paranoid checks in core-book3s was to verify
privilege access before capturing some of the sample data. Along with
paranoid checks, perf_allow_kernel() also does a
security_perf_event_open(). Since these functions are accessed while
recording a sample, we end up calling selinux_perf_event_open() in PMI
context. Some of the security functions use spinlock like
sidtab_sid2str_put(). If a perf interrupt hits under a spin lock and
if we end up in calling selinux hook functions in PMI handler, this
could cause a dead lock.
Since the purpose of this security hook is to control access to
perf_event_open(), it is not right to call this in interrupt context.
The paranoid checks in powerpc core-book3s were done at interrupt time
which is also not correct.
Reference commits:
Commit cd1231d7035f ("powerpc/perf: Prevent kernel address leak via perf_get_data_addr()")
Commit bb19af816025 ("powerpc/perf: Prevent kernel address leak to userspace via BHRB buffer")
We only allow creation of events that have already passed the
privilege checks in perf_event_open(). So these paranoid checks are
not needed at event time. As a fix, patch uses
'event->attr.exclude_kernel' check to prevent exposing kernel address
for userspace only sampling.
Fixes: cd1231d7035f ("powerpc/perf: Prevent kernel address leak via perf_get_data_addr()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.17+
Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1614247839-1428-1-git-send-email-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 6817331e22ff..766f064f00fb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static inline void perf_get_data_addr(struct perf_event *event, struct pt_regs *
if (!(mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) || sdar_valid)
*addrp = mfspr(SPRN_SDAR);
- if (is_kernel_addr(mfspr(SPRN_SDAR)) && perf_allow_kernel(&event->attr) != 0)
+ if (is_kernel_addr(mfspr(SPRN_SDAR)) && event->attr.exclude_kernel)
*addrp = 0;
}
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static void power_pmu_bhrb_read(struct perf_event *event, struct cpu_hw_events *
* addresses, hence include a check before filtering code
*/
if (!(ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_31) &&
- is_kernel_addr(addr) && perf_allow_kernel(&event->attr) != 0)
+ is_kernel_addr(addr) && event->attr.exclude_kernel)
continue;
/* Branches are read most recent first (ie. mfbhrb 0 is
reply other threads:[~2021-03-11 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1615484611128126@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.