From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nikita Danilov Subject: Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:10:33 +0400 Message-ID: <16159.48809.812634.455756@laputa.namesys.com> References: <3F1EF7DB.2010805@namesys.com> <3F1F6005.4060307@tupshin.com> <1059021113.7911.13.camel@localhost> <3F1F66F0.1050406@tupshin.com> <1059024090.9728.22.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <1059024090.9728.22.camel@localhost> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Shawn Cc: Tupshin Harper , Hans Reiser , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , reiserfs mailing list Shawn writes: > Looks like the 2.5.74 is the last one of any respectable size. I'm > thinking someone forgot a diff switch (N?) over at namesys... > > Hans? Time to long-distance spank someone? Can you try following the instructions on the http://www.namesys.com/code.html (requires bitkeeper)? Nikita. > > On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 23:56, Tupshin Harper wrote: > > Shawn wrote: > > > > >This is pretty f'ed, but it's on ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/tmp > > > > > Thanks, but I tried applying the > > 2.6.0-test1-reiser4-2.6.0-test1.diff from that location with a lack of > > success. > > > > It applied cleanly, but it doesn't add a fs/reiser4 directory and > > asociated contents. Is there an additional patch, or is this one broken? > > > > -Tupshin > >