From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: bgardon@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, pfeiner@google.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Yield in TDU MMU iter even if no SPTES changed" failed to apply to 5.11-stable tree
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 10:07:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1617437228185186@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.11-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 1af4a96025b33587ca953c7ef12a1b20c6e70412 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:57:20 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Yield in TDU MMU iter even if no SPTES changed
Given certain conditions, some TDP MMU functions may not yield
reliably / frequently enough. For example, if a paging structure was
very large but had few, if any writable entries, wrprot_gfn_range
could traverse many entries before finding a writable entry and yielding
because the check for yielding only happens after an SPTE is modified.
Fix this issue by moving the yield to the beginning of the loop.
Fixes: a6a0b05da9f3 ("kvm: x86/mmu: Support dirty logging for the TDP MMU")
Reviewed-by: Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Message-Id: <20210202185734.1680553-15-bgardon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 7cfc0639b1ef..c8a1149cb229 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -501,6 +501,12 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
bool flush_needed = false;
tdp_root_for_each_pte(iter, root, start, end) {
+ if (can_yield &&
+ tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, flush_needed)) {
+ flush_needed = false;
+ continue;
+ }
+
if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte))
continue;
@@ -515,9 +521,7 @@ static bool zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
continue;
tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
-
- flush_needed = !(can_yield &&
- tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, true));
+ flush_needed = true;
}
return flush_needed;
}
@@ -880,6 +884,9 @@ static bool wrprot_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
for_each_tdp_pte_min_level(iter, root->spt, root->role.level,
min_level, start, end) {
+ if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false))
+ continue;
+
if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte) ||
!is_last_spte(iter.old_spte, iter.level))
continue;
@@ -888,8 +895,6 @@ static bool wrprot_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
tdp_mmu_set_spte_no_dirty_log(kvm, &iter, new_spte);
spte_set = true;
-
- tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false);
}
return spte_set;
}
@@ -933,6 +938,9 @@ static bool clear_dirty_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
bool spte_set = false;
tdp_root_for_each_leaf_pte(iter, root, start, end) {
+ if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false))
+ continue;
+
if (spte_ad_need_write_protect(iter.old_spte)) {
if (is_writable_pte(iter.old_spte))
new_spte = iter.old_spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
@@ -947,8 +955,6 @@ static bool clear_dirty_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
tdp_mmu_set_spte_no_dirty_log(kvm, &iter, new_spte);
spte_set = true;
-
- tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false);
}
return spte_set;
}
@@ -1056,6 +1062,9 @@ static bool set_dirty_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
bool spte_set = false;
tdp_root_for_each_pte(iter, root, start, end) {
+ if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false))
+ continue;
+
if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte))
continue;
@@ -1063,8 +1072,6 @@ static bool set_dirty_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, new_spte);
spte_set = true;
-
- tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false);
}
return spte_set;
@@ -1105,6 +1112,11 @@ static void zap_collapsible_spte_range(struct kvm *kvm,
bool spte_set = false;
tdp_root_for_each_pte(iter, root, start, end) {
+ if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, spte_set)) {
+ spte_set = false;
+ continue;
+ }
+
if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte) ||
!is_last_spte(iter.old_spte, iter.level))
continue;
@@ -1116,7 +1128,7 @@ static void zap_collapsible_spte_range(struct kvm *kvm,
tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, 0);
- spte_set = !tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, true);
+ spte_set = true;
}
if (spte_set)
reply other threads:[~2021-04-03 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1617437228185186@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pfeiner@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.