From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sassmann@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Treat __napi_schedule_irqoff() as __napi_schedule() on PREEMPT_RT
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 20:20:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <162093721042.5649.1489711837264906533.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210512214324.hiaiw3e2tzmsygcz@linutronix.de>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Wed, 12 May 2021 23:43:24 +0200 you wrote:
> __napi_schedule_irqoff() is an optimized version of __napi_schedule()
> which can be used where it is known that interrupts are disabled,
> e.g. in interrupt-handlers, spin_lock_irq() sections or hrtimer
> callbacks.
>
> On PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels this assumptions is not true. Force-
> threaded interrupt handlers and spinlocks are not disabling interrupts
> and the NAPI hrtimer callback is forced into softirq context which runs
> with interrupts enabled as well.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next] net: Treat __napi_schedule_irqoff() as __napi_schedule() on PREEMPT_RT
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8380c81d5c4f
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-13 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-11 6:09 [RT] Question about i40e threaded irq Juri Lelli
2021-05-11 6:24 ` Stefan Assmann
2021-05-11 7:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-12 21:43 ` [PATCH net-next] net: Treat __napi_schedule_irqoff() as __napi_schedule() on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-05-12 22:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-13 0:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-05-13 16:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-05-14 12:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-14 18:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-05-14 19:44 ` Alison Chaiken
2021-05-14 21:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-14 20:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-14 20:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-05-13 5:12 ` Juri Lelli
2021-05-13 20:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=162093721042.5649.1489711837264906533.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.