From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:52:07 +0400 From: Andrey Volkov Reply-To: Andrey Volkov Message-ID: <16210643353.20040824145207@varma-el.com> To: David Woodhouse Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re[2]: [RFC] Re: BestComm and fec In-Reply-To: <1093337686.3777.755.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> References: <412A4B69.7000305@246tNt.com> <149461203.20040824120707@varma-el.com> <1093337686.3777.755.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Hello David, Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 12:54:46 PM, you wrote: > On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 12:07 +0400, Andrey Volkov wrote: >> Terrible, may be its time to create special project for MPC5200 (if it >> doesn't exist in somewhere in I-net)? First intention - sourceforge. >> Comments/suggestions? > Don't start a new project. Just put your changes into the official 2.6 > tree. > The goal of _all_ external trees should be to make themselves obsolete > by getting all changes to Linus as quickly as possible. Why shoot > yourself in the foot? Indeed, BUT: 1) IMHO mail list better approach for along developer <-> maintainer/many tester scheme of development. Cvs/bk will be better for team work isn't it? 2) So somewhere must exist place for coordination of job, 'cause I see as minimum 5 person doing SAME work (terrible). 3) And I wish have common place for experiments and testing. AFAIK, stable kernel is not appropriate for it. (If I wrong - why exist -mm -ac etc branches? :) -- Best regards, Andrey Volkov ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/