From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hansverk@cisco.com>
Cc: linux-media <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>,
Pawel Osciak <pawel@osciak.com>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vb2: regression fix for vbi capture & poll
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:32:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1622124.9R2KLtfafx@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <541810E2.4040509@cisco.com>
Hi Hans,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday 16 September 2014 12:28:50 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> (My proposal to fix this. Note that it is untested, I plan to do that this
> evening)
>
> Commit 9241650d62f7 broke vbi capture applications that expect POLLERR to be
> returned if STREAMON wasn't called.
>
> Rather than checking whether buffers were queued AND vb2 was not yet
> streaming, just check whether streaming is in progress and return POLLERR
> if not.
>
> This change makes it impossible to poll in one thread and call STREAMON in
> another, but doing that breaks existing applications and is also not
> according to the spec. So be it.
I like this approach better than reverting the offending patch, as it doesn't
break my use case :-)
If we decide that this is the right fix, we should update the V4L2
specification to reflect that.
I've proposed an alternative solution in a reply to the "[PATCH/RFC v2 1/2]
v4l: vb2: Don't return POLLERR during transient buffer underruns" mail thread.
I think I like this patch better, as the behaviour is simpler, even if it
doesn't strictly conform to the spec.
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c index 7e6aff6..0452fb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> @@ -2583,10 +2583,10 @@ unsigned int vb2_poll(struct vb2_queue *q, struct
> file *file, poll_table *wait) }
>
> /*
> - * There is nothing to wait for if no buffer has been queued and the
> - * queue isn't streaming, or if the error flag is set.
> + * There is nothing to wait for if the queue isn't streaming, or if
> + * the error flag is set.
> */
> - if ((list_empty(&q->queued_list) && !vb2_is_streaming(q)) || q->error)
> + if (!vb2_is_streaming(q) || q->error)
> return res | POLLERR;
>
> /*
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-16 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-16 10:28 [RFC PATCH] vb2: regression fix for vbi capture & poll Hans Verkuil
2014-09-16 10:32 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-09-16 9:28 Hans Verkuil
2014-09-16 13:50 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2014-09-16 14:02 ` Hans Verkuil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1622124.9R2KLtfafx@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=hansverk@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
--cc=nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com \
--cc=pawel@osciak.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.