From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
edumazet@google.com, shakeelb@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/3] net: add new socket option SO_RESERVE_MEM
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:50:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <163300620809.1111.4905714212204854007.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210929172513.3930074-1-weiwan@google.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 10:25:10 -0700 you wrote:
> This patch series introduces a new socket option SO_RESERVE_MEM.
> This socket option provides a mechanism for users to reserve a certain
> amount of memory for the socket to use. When this option is set, kernel
> charges the user specified amount of memory to memcg, as well as
> sk_forward_alloc. This amount of memory is not reclaimable and is
> available in sk_forward_alloc for this socket.
> With this socket option set, the networking stack spends less cycles
> doing forward alloc and reclaim, which should lead to better system
> performance, with the cost of an amount of pre-allocated and
> unreclaimable memory, even under memory pressure.
> With a tcp_stream test with 10 flows running on a simulated 100ms RTT
> link, I can see the cycles spent in __sk_mem_raise_allocated() dropping
> by ~0.02%. Not a whole lot, since we already have logic in
> sk_mem_uncharge() to only reclaim 1MB when sk_forward_alloc has more
> than 2MB free space. But on a system suffering memory pressure
> constently, the savings should be more.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v3,net-next,1/3] net: add new socket option SO_RESERVE_MEM
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2bb2f5fb21b0
- [v3,net-next,2/3] tcp: adjust sndbuf according to sk_reserved_mem
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ca057051cf25
- [v3,net-next,3/3] tcp: adjust rcv_ssthresh according to sk_reserved_mem
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/053f368412c9
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-30 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-29 17:25 [PATCH v3 net-next 0/3] net: add new socket option SO_RESERVE_MEM Wei Wang
2021-09-29 17:25 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 1/3] " Wei Wang
2021-09-29 17:25 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 2/3] tcp: adjust sndbuf according to sk_reserved_mem Wei Wang
2021-09-29 17:25 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 3/3] tcp: adjust rcv_ssthresh " Wei Wang
2021-09-30 12:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=163300620809.1111.4905714212204854007.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=weiwan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.