From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47893) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0ByY-0004Jc-Fu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:52:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0ByS-0008UI-P2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:52:38 -0400 Received: from zimbra3.corp.accelance.fr ([2001:4080:204::2:8]:34735) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0ByS-0008U9-Iq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:52:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:52:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Sebastian Tanase Message-ID: <1636388149.18939636.1403797946308.JavaMail.root@openwide.fr> In-Reply-To: <53AC3D29.8040609@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/13] Reverse execution. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: peter maydell , quintela@redhat.com, mark burton , dgilbert@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, camille begue , amit shah , vilanova@ac.upc.edu, Frederic Konrad Hello, I'll be sending a new version (V3) of the patches on Monday. The patches ad= d QemuOpts handling to the "-icount option". If you want I can only send the part of t= he patch that adds QemuOpts support. Best regards, Sebastian Tanase ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Paolo Bonzini" > =C3=80: "Frederic Konrad" , qemu-devel@nongnu.= org > Cc: "peter maydell" , quintela@redhat.com, "mar= k burton" , > dgilbert@redhat.com, "amit shah" , vilanova@ac.upc.= edu, "sebastian tanase" > , "camille begue" > Envoy=C3=A9: Jeudi 26 Juin 2014 17:32:57 > Objet: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/13] Reverse execution. >=20 > Il 26/06/2014 17:11, Frederic Konrad ha scritto: > > > > > > Are you talking of this patch on the list: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-06/msg03039.html > > ? > > > > It seems to includes the "align" options too. Is that possible to > > split > > it up? >=20 > Sure, you can split it up and when the original authors will rebase > they > will be able to add "align" on top. >=20 > Paolo >=20