From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488BEC433EF for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 21:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F7D61361 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 21:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240330AbhKHVcw (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:32:52 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:52594 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239289AbhKHVcw (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:32:52 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C20B61181; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 21:30:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1636407007; bh=spRHXcGTXUYBf46hJjqceMd3cP9sEtQ9oVe+PiZLYFs=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=K7wO4kL8/3mD4COANLC2woAr4SU779+wtR9arXyDV68fe4z75LLMiQmDIsR83cGUa d7v5x2eYk3Xfay/eHLnWRXgJTo83cJfA4cTLOkUqij6FFSOhreX+nOe0CJSyb6zx6y DAJ6XDhi6/vQeX2K9cMaiCkobKgvMR1l95KJABiMzbBr7mv6Hjw6601yKb/aXqqTRA gyigOLIf3q7AM/DLVmI0Muy0ouLb752rehmqPYA/Vam/cxiPXNfkUVjhBHZL3eI294 mX+To6S+v3aam4nBW+wz0NjLyd6h4bY0C0zg/BmhXmklpPMUrNPbuS8bczp3eqZ/Wj IxQxlS7/AEIjg== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/2] arm64/bpf: remove 128MB limit for BPF JIT programs From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <163640700729.18756.3678999671690416622.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 21:30:07 +0000 References: <1636131046-5982-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <1636131046-5982-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com> To: Alan Maguire Cc: ardb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org, zlim.lnx@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, andreyknvl@gmail.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, samitolvanen@google.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn, jthierry@redhat.com, tiantao6@hisilicon.com, pcc@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@kernel.org, Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Daniel Borkmann : On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:50:44 +0000 you wrote: > There is a 128MB limit on BPF JIT program allocations; this is > to ensure BPF programs are in branching range of each other. > Patch 1 in this series removes this restriction. To verify > exception handling still works, a test case to validate > exception handling in BPF programs is added in patch 2. > > There was previous discussion around this topic [1], in particular > would be good to get feedback from Daniel if this approach makes > sense. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [v2,bpf-next,1/2] arm64/bpf: remove 128MB limit for BPF JIT programs https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b89ddf4cca43 - [v2,bpf-next,2/2] selftests/bpf: add exception handling selftests for tp_bpf program https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c23551c9c36a You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5C7C433EF for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 21:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 065DA61361 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 21:31:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 065DA61361 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date: Message-Id:From:Subject:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Z3Q+3/M3v7I2UP/n9YA9E18dvEE4AX4SWhhqZweDdtE=; b=R/e0F79MY0ZwgW L7kfkqfDIIYylsANJeM+6B+NgqyJS3s0uau89Ap5NsI1QZ9YkRXvKZJOVsADRRDxiM8TUVMiwEP3Z R1GN8PV4Qd0pY/AN5JY70mDM+O5terb30SN7RCl5cheNKk6aIbMyZcOOMpBfzMn+rJ3a8MweRM4Ln LTkQEurWDosp43ma6L0GD33EVdTjiCiIbGrmuojMf+YhVoerDajH8oJXZolBDVSzpF5/rvdkbfx0J 5UUthzRCzv56Q3r45mGcPRWXxhyUlsWSAIKohPo1Op/1pwpJZ3WXgDYFDKiZoxacp8U3qqBModNAx d30zkmneteBvMibeVD3g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mkCDT-00HUnZ-CM; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 21:30:11 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mkCDQ-00HUmh-5p for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 21:30:09 +0000 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C20B61181; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 21:30:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1636407007; bh=spRHXcGTXUYBf46hJjqceMd3cP9sEtQ9oVe+PiZLYFs=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=K7wO4kL8/3mD4COANLC2woAr4SU779+wtR9arXyDV68fe4z75LLMiQmDIsR83cGUa d7v5x2eYk3Xfay/eHLnWRXgJTo83cJfA4cTLOkUqij6FFSOhreX+nOe0CJSyb6zx6y DAJ6XDhi6/vQeX2K9cMaiCkobKgvMR1l95KJABiMzbBr7mv6Hjw6601yKb/aXqqTRA gyigOLIf3q7AM/DLVmI0Muy0ouLb752rehmqPYA/Vam/cxiPXNfkUVjhBHZL3eI294 mX+To6S+v3aam4nBW+wz0NjLyd6h4bY0C0zg/BmhXmklpPMUrNPbuS8bczp3eqZ/Wj IxQxlS7/AEIjg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/2] arm64/bpf: remove 128MB limit for BPF JIT programs From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <163640700729.18756.3678999671690416622.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 21:30:07 +0000 References: <1636131046-5982-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <1636131046-5982-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com> To: Alan Maguire Cc: ardb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org, zlim.lnx@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, andreyknvl@gmail.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, samitolvanen@google.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn, jthierry@redhat.com, tiantao6@hisilicon.com, pcc@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@kernel.org, Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211108_133008_259330_244EAE6E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.68 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Daniel Borkmann : On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 16:50:44 +0000 you wrote: > There is a 128MB limit on BPF JIT program allocations; this is > to ensure BPF programs are in branching range of each other. > Patch 1 in this series removes this restriction. To verify > exception handling still works, a test case to validate > exception handling in BPF programs is added in patch 2. > > There was previous discussion around this topic [1], in particular > would be good to get feedback from Daniel if this approach makes > sense. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [v2,bpf-next,1/2] arm64/bpf: remove 128MB limit for BPF JIT programs https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b89ddf4cca43 - [v2,bpf-next,2/2] selftests/bpf: add exception handling selftests for tp_bpf program https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c23551c9c36a You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel