All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	sfroemer@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] tcp: fix page frag corruption on page fault" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2021 14:02:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <163870935910576@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From dacb5d8875cc6cd3a553363b4d6f06760fcbe70c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 19:34:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] tcp: fix page frag corruption on page fault

Steffen reported a TCP stream corruption for HTTP requests
served by the apache web-server using a cifs mount-point
and memory mapping the relevant file.

The root cause is quite similar to the one addressed by
commit 20eb4f29b602 ("net: fix sk_page_frag() recursion from
memory reclaim"). Here the nested access to the task page frag
is caused by a page fault on the (mmapped) user-space memory
buffer coming from the cifs file.

The page fault handler performs an smb transaction on a different
socket, inside the same process context. Since sk->sk_allaction
for such socket does not prevent the usage for the task_frag,
the nested allocation modify "under the hood" the page frag
in use by the outer sendmsg call, corrupting the stream.

The overall relevant stack trace looks like the following:

httpd 78268 [001] 3461630.850950:      probe:tcp_sendmsg_locked:
        ffffffff91461d91 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x1
        ffffffff91462b57 tcp_sendmsg+0x27
        ffffffff9139814e sock_sendmsg+0x3e
        ffffffffc06dfe1d smb_send_kvec+0x28
        [...]
        ffffffffc06cfaf8 cifs_readpages+0x213
        ffffffff90e83c4b read_pages+0x6b
        ffffffff90e83f31 __do_page_cache_readahead+0x1c1
        ffffffff90e79e98 filemap_fault+0x788
        ffffffff90eb0458 __do_fault+0x38
        ffffffff90eb5280 do_fault+0x1a0
        ffffffff90eb7c84 __handle_mm_fault+0x4d4
        ffffffff90eb8093 handle_mm_fault+0xc3
        ffffffff90c74f6d __do_page_fault+0x1ed
        ffffffff90c75277 do_page_fault+0x37
        ffffffff9160111e page_fault+0x1e
        ffffffff9109e7b5 copyin+0x25
        ffffffff9109eb40 _copy_from_iter_full+0xe0
        ffffffff91462370 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x5e0
        ffffffff91462370 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x5e0
        ffffffff91462b57 tcp_sendmsg+0x27
        ffffffff9139815c sock_sendmsg+0x4c
        ffffffff913981f7 sock_write_iter+0x97
        ffffffff90f2cc56 do_iter_readv_writev+0x156
        ffffffff90f2dff0 do_iter_write+0x80
        ffffffff90f2e1c3 vfs_writev+0xa3
        ffffffff90f2e27c do_writev+0x5c
        ffffffff90c042bb do_syscall_64+0x5b
        ffffffff916000ad entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65

The cifs filesystem rightfully sets sk_allocations to GFP_NOFS,
we can avoid the nesting using the sk page frag for allocation
lacking the __GFP_FS flag. Do not define an additional mm-helper
for that, as this is strictly tied to the sk page frag usage.

v1 -> v2:
 - use a stricted sk_page_frag() check instead of reordering the
   code (Eric)

Reported-by: Steffen Froemer <sfroemer@redhat.com>
Fixes: 5640f7685831 ("net: use a per task frag allocator")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index b32906e1ab55..715cdb4b2b79 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -2430,19 +2430,22 @@ static inline void sk_stream_moderate_sndbuf(struct sock *sk)
  * @sk: socket
  *
  * Use the per task page_frag instead of the per socket one for
- * optimization when we know that we're in the normal context and owns
+ * optimization when we know that we're in process context and own
  * everything that's associated with %current.
  *
- * gfpflags_allow_blocking() isn't enough here as direct reclaim may nest
- * inside other socket operations and end up recursing into sk_page_frag()
- * while it's already in use.
+ * Both direct reclaim and page faults can nest inside other
+ * socket operations and end up recursing into sk_page_frag()
+ * while it's already in use: explicitly avoid task page_frag
+ * usage if the caller is potentially doing any of them.
+ * This assumes that page fault handlers use the GFP_NOFS flags.
  *
  * Return: a per task page_frag if context allows that,
  * otherwise a per socket one.
  */
 static inline struct page_frag *sk_page_frag(struct sock *sk)
 {
-	if (gfpflags_normal_context(sk->sk_allocation))
+	if ((sk->sk_allocation & (__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM | __GFP_MEMALLOC | __GFP_FS)) ==
+	    (__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM | __GFP_FS))
 		return &current->task_frag;
 
 	return &sk->sk_frag;


                 reply	other threads:[~2021-12-05 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=163870935910576@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sfroemer@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.