From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: mike.marciniszyn@cornelisnetworks.com,
dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com, jgg@nvidia.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] IB/hfi1: Insure use of smp_processor_id() is preempt disabled" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 12:29:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <163913576417121@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From b6d57e24ce6cc3df8a8845e1b193e88a65d501b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@cornelisnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 14:19:58 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] IB/hfi1: Insure use of smp_processor_id() is preempt disabled
The following BUG has just surfaced with our 5.16 testing:
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: mpicheck/1581081
caller is sdma_select_user_engine+0x72/0x210 [hfi1]
CPU: 0 PID: 1581081 Comm: mpicheck Tainted: G S 5.16.0-rc1+ #1
Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WT2R/S2600WT2R, BIOS SE5C610.86B.01.01.0016.033120161139 03/31/2016
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x42
check_preemption_disabled+0xbf/0xe0
sdma_select_user_engine+0x72/0x210 [hfi1]
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1f/0x31
? hfi1_mmu_rb_insert+0x6b/0x200 [hfi1]
hfi1_user_sdma_process_request+0xa02/0x1120 [hfi1]
? hfi1_write_iter+0xb8/0x200 [hfi1]
hfi1_write_iter+0xb8/0x200 [hfi1]
do_iter_readv_writev+0x163/0x1c0
do_iter_write+0x80/0x1c0
vfs_writev+0x88/0x1a0
? recalibrate_cpu_khz+0x10/0x10
? ktime_get+0x3e/0xa0
? __fget_files+0x66/0xa0
do_writev+0x65/0x100
do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80
Fix this long standing bug by moving the smp_processor_id() to after the
rcu_read_lock().
The rcu_read_lock() implicitly disables preemption.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129191958.101968.87329.stgit@awfm-01.cornelisnetworks.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 0cb2aa690c7e ("IB/hfi1: Add sysfs interface for affinity setup")
Signed-off-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@cornelisnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/sdma.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/sdma.c
index 2b6c24b7b586..f07d328689d3 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/sdma.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/sdma.c
@@ -838,8 +838,8 @@ struct sdma_engine *sdma_select_user_engine(struct hfi1_devdata *dd,
if (current->nr_cpus_allowed != 1)
goto out;
- cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
rcu_read_lock();
+ cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
rht_node = rhashtable_lookup(dd->sdma_rht, &cpu_id,
sdma_rht_params);
reply other threads:[~2021-12-10 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=163913576417121@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=mike.marciniszyn@cornelisnetworks.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.