From: "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net>
To: kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
Cc: lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, garritfranke@gmail.com, greg@kroah.com
Subject: Re: Please give advise about my first patch attempt
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 17:59:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16413737425884866123@scdbackup.webframe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8257736897954643869@scdbackup.webframe.org>
Hi,
i'm back at work with my patch for automatic CD loading, but the target
moves faster than i can follow.
Meanwhile the sr part of my change plays on a fresh construction site
of linux-scsi:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/730eced4-c804-a78f-3d52-2a448dbd1b84@interlog.com/T/#t
"rework check_disk_change()"
2020-09-02 14:11 Christoph Hellwig
Currently our plans overlap by [PATCH 17/19] "sr: use
bdev_check_media_change" although they do not (yet) really conflict
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/730eced4-c804-a78f-3d52-2a448dbd1b84@interlog.com/T/#m9d4c4b6145ed41d6467f2dc4728d6fd0345e94f1
It seems unwise to propose changes while Christoph Hellwig is actively
working on the same code.
(And i don't even know where to get the git branch with such a recent
change when it is committed.)
What is the socially acceptable way to coordinate plans with him ?
- Shall i patiently wait until he is done with cdrom and sr ?
- Shall i announce my interest in fixing automatic tray loading and
other things in a brief mail to the list ?
- Shall i post my patches (*) as they are and just wait for instructions ?
(*)
Studying Christoph's work in linux-scsi brought me to the prediction
that they will want separate patches for cdrom and sr.
Also i reworked my implementation along his design pattern of factoring
out and exporting functions and then calling them where beneficial.
(I.e. my -EDEADLK hack is dead. Long live cdrom_handle_open_tray().
Larger cdrom patch, but also nicer looking code.)
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-03 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-27 8:49 Please give advise about my first patch attempt Thomas Schmitt
2020-08-27 9:26 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-08-27 16:34 ` Thomas Schmitt
2020-08-27 17:30 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-08-28 13:03 ` Thomas Schmitt
2020-09-03 15:59 ` Thomas Schmitt [this message]
2020-08-27 9:52 ` Garrit Franke
2020-08-27 13:19 ` Greg KH
2020-08-27 14:02 ` Leam Hall
2020-08-27 16:01 ` Greg KH
2020-08-27 18:32 ` Pawan Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16413737425884866123@scdbackup.webframe.org \
--to=scdbackup@gmx.net \
--cc=garritfranke@gmail.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.