All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Martin <furryfuttock@gmail.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Strange interdependace between domains
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:56:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1646915994.20140213165604@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi all,

Sorry, I just sent this without a subject. Here it is with the subject
as it should be.

I  am  now successfully running my little operating system inside Xen.
It  is  fully  preemptive and working a treat, but I have just noticed
something  I  wasn't expecting, and will really be a problem for me if
I can't work around it.

My configuration is as follows:

1.- Hardware: Intel i3, 4GB RAM, 64GB SSD.

2.- Xen: 4.4 (just pulled from repository)

3.- Dom0: Debian Wheezy (Kernel 3.2)

4.- 2 cpu pools:

# xl cpupool-list
Name               CPUs   Sched     Active   Domain count
Pool-0               3    credit       y          2
pv499                1  arinc653       y          1

5.- 2 domU:

# xl list
Name                                        ID   Mem VCPUs      State   Time(s)
Domain-0                                     0   984     3     r-----      39.7
win7x64                                      1  2046     3     -b----     143.0
pv499                                        3   128     1     -b----      61.2

6.- All VCPUs are pinned:

# xl vcpu-list
Name                                ID  VCPU   CPU State   Time(s) CPU Affinity
Domain-0                             0     0    0   -b-      27.5  0
Domain-0                             0     1    1   -b-       7.2  1
Domain-0                             0     2    2   r--       5.1  2
win7x64                              1     0    0   -b-      71.6  0
win7x64                              1     1    1   -b-      37.7  1
win7x64                              1     2    2   -b-      34.5  2
pv499                                3     0    3   -b-      62.1  3

7.- pv499 is the domU that I am testing. It has no disk or vif devices
(yet). I am running a little test program in pv499 and the timing I
see is varies depending on disk activity.

My test program runs prints up the time taken in milliseconds for a
million cycles. With no disk activity I see 940 ms, with disk activity
I see 1200 ms.

I can't understand this as disk activity should be running on cores 0,
1  and 2, but never on core 3. The only thing running on core 3 should
by my paravirtual machine and the hypervisor stub.

Any idea what's going on?


-- 
Best regards,
 Simon                          mailto:furryfuttock@gmail.com

             reply	other threads:[~2014-02-13 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-13 16:56 Simon Martin [this message]
2014-02-13 17:07 ` Strange interdependace between domains Ian Campbell
2014-02-13 17:28   ` Simon Martin
2014-02-13 17:39     ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-13 17:36 ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-13 20:47   ` Nate Studer
2014-02-13 22:25   ` Simon Martin
2014-02-13 23:13     ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-14 10:26       ` Don Slutz
2014-02-14 12:02     ` Simon Martin
2014-02-14 13:26       ` Andrew Cooper
2014-02-14 17:21       ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-17 12:46         ` Simon Martin
2014-02-18 16:55           ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-18 17:58             ` Don Slutz
2014-02-18 18:06               ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-20  6:07                 ` Juergen Gross
2014-02-20 18:22                   ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-21  6:31                     ` Juergen Gross
2014-02-21 17:24                       ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-24  9:25                         ` Juergen Gross
2014-02-17 13:19         ` Juergen Gross
2014-02-17 15:08           ` Dario Faggioli
2014-02-18  5:31             ` Juergen Gross
2014-02-17 14:13         ` Nate Studer
2014-02-18 16:47           ` Dario Faggioli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1646915994.20140213165604@gmail.com \
    --to=furryfuttock@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.